Literature DB >> 8801212

Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Scotland.

C M Lam1, F E Murray, A Cuschieri.   

Abstract

This survey determined the effect of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on the rates of cholecystectomy (total and laparoscopic) in Scotland. From 1977 to 1990, the Scottish cholecystectomy rate fell by an average of almost 1% per annum. With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the total cholecystectomy rate (open and laparoscopic) rose considerably--by 18.7% from 1989-93 (p < 0.05). The largest increase (25%) was observed in the 45-64 years age group but it was also particularly evident (19%) in elderly patients (65-74 years). Subjects were more likely to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy than open cholecystectomy if they were young and female. The increased cholecystectomy rate observed merits careful scrutiny and health economic evaluation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8801212      PMCID: PMC1383038          DOI: 10.1136/gut.38.2.282

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  14 in total

1.  Diagnostic laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  H M Spiro
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1992-01-18       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Decreasing frequency of cholecystectomies in the counties of Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden.

Authors:  J Ahlberg; S Ewerth; G Hellers; B Holmström
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl       Date:  1978

3.  Surgical rates and operative mortality for open and laparoscopic cholecystectomy in Maryland.

Authors:  C A Steiner; E B Bass; M A Talamini; H A Pitt; E P Steinberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-02-10       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Prospective audit of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the west of Scotland. West of Scotland Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Audit Group.

Authors:  G M Fullarton; G Bell
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 23.059

5.  Cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus open cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E B Bass; H A Pitt; K D Lillemoe
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Cost effectiveness of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  B D Schirmer; J Dix
Journal:  J Laparoendosc Surg       Date:  1992-08

7.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy as a safe and effective treatment for severe acute cholecystitis.

Authors:  R G Wilson; I M Macintyre; S J Nixon; J H Saunders; J S Varma; P M King
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-15

8.  Increased cholecystectomy rate after the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  A P Legorreta; J H Silber; G N Costantino; R W Kobylinski; S L Zatz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1993 Sep 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. A prospective analysis of 100 initial patients.

Authors:  J H Peters; E C Ellison; J T Innes; J L Liss; K E Nichols; J M Lomano; S R Roby; M E Front; L C Carey
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic versus minilaparotomy cholecystectomy: a randomised trial.

Authors:  A J McMahon; I T Russell; J N Baxter; S Ross; J R Anderson; C G Morran; G Sunderland; D Galloway; G Ramsay; P J O'Dwyer
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1994-01-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  24 in total

Review 1.  Fortnightly review: gallbladder disease.

Authors:  M C Bateson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-06-26

2.  Development of explicit criteria for cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J M Quintana; J Cabriada; I López de Tejada; M Varona; V Oribe; B Barrios; I Aróstegui; A Bilbao
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2002-12

Review 3.  Cholecystectomy and the risk of alimentary tract cancers: a systematic review.

Authors:  Maria Coats; Sami M Shimi
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

4.  Mortality associated with the treatment of gallstone disease: a 10-year contemporary national experience.

Authors:  John M Scollay; Russell Mullen; Gillian McPhillips; Alastair M Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Single-trocar cholecystectomy using a flexible endoscope and articulating laparoscopic instruments: a bridge to NOTES or the final form?

Authors:  Ram Elazary; Abed Khalaileh; Gideon Zamir; Michael Har-Lev; Gidon Almogy; Avraham I Rivkind; Yoav Mintz
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-01-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Incidence of persistent symptoms after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective study.

Authors:  W Luman; W H Adams; S N Nixon; I M Mcintyre; D Hamer-Hodges; G Wilson; K R Palmer
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  A comparison of effectiveness of two surgical units in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Libert Anil Gomes
Journal:  Int J Health Sci (Qassim)       Date:  2008-07

8.  Are blood group and save samples needed for cholecystectomy?

Authors:  Martha Quinn; Stuart Suttie; Alan Li; Rajan Ravindran
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Local infiltration versus laparoscopic-guided transverse abdominis plane block in laparoscopic cholecystectomy: double-blinded randomized control trial.

Authors:  Rohan C Siriwardana; Sumudu K Kumarage; Bhagya M Gunathilake; Suchintha B Thilakarathne; Jeevani S Wijesinghe
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Increased cholecystectomy rate in the laparoscopic era: a study of the potential causative factors.

Authors:  P Mallon; J White; M McMenamin; N Das; D Hughes; R Gilliland
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.