Literature DB >> 3977435

Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. Pre- and perioperative factors of importance.

A Andrén-Sandberg, G Alinder, S Bengmark.   

Abstract

The 65 reports of accidental lesions of the choledochus at cholecystectomy from the records of the Patients' Insurance Syndicate in Stockholm, Sweden, 1975-1982, were studied in order to characterize avoidable factors and/or situations at cholecystectomy. Compared with control materials, there were significantly less men (28 vs. 34%) and the patients were younger (46 vs. 54 years). The patients were without significant other diseases and former operations, and were slim or of a normal weight. The patients had a short history of known biliary tract disease and there was seldom a suspicion of common duct stone. Most of the surgeons were under training and 80% of them had done 25 to 100 cholecystectomies before, seldom assisted by a more experienced surgeon. The inflammation was never severe, the bleeding insignificant, and an anomaly was found after the lesion was done in only 16 of 55 cases. The lesion was done before cholangiography in 27 cases and after the cholangiography, but before the films were available in 32 cases. The gallbladder was excised about as often from the fundus as from the pouch. We have found it probable that most of these accidental injuries of the choledochus could have been prevented with a policy that considers cholecystectomy as a major operation that requires well-trained surgeons with a humble and concentrated approach to their task.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 3977435      PMCID: PMC1250674     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  8 in total

1.  Decreasing frequency of cholecystectomies in the counties of Stockholm and Uppsala, Sweden.

Authors:  J Ahlberg; S Ewerth; G Hellers; B Holmström
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand Suppl       Date:  1978

2.  [Length of stay after gallstone operations].

Authors:  S Bengmark; T Schersten; G Sterky; S O Liljedahl; B Smedby; H Wedel
Journal:  Lakartidningen       Date:  1979-11-07

3.  Management of strictures of the biliary tract.

Authors:  K W Warren; J C Mountain; A I Midell
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1971-06       Impact factor: 2.741

4.  Long term results of Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy.

Authors:  H Bismuth; D Franco; M B Corlette; J Hepp
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1978-02

5.  Iatrogenic strictures of the bile ducts: our experience with 66 cases.

Authors:  G Castrini; G Pappalardo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Biliary stricture.

Authors:  L W Way; R A Bernhoft; M J Thomas
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.741

7.  Surgical injury of the common bile duct.

Authors:  T M Hillis; K C Westbrook; F T Caldwell; R C Read
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1977-12       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  The use of silastic transhepatic stents in benign and malignant biliary strictures.

Authors:  J L Cameron; B W Gayler; G D Zuidema
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 12.969

  8 in total
  35 in total

1.  Visual identification of the cystic duct-CBD junction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy (visual cholangiography): an additional step for prevention of CBD injuries.

Authors:  N Katkhouda; E Mavor; R J Mason
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Repair of bile duct injuries with Gore-Tex vascular grafts: experimental study in dogs.

Authors:  Néstor A Gómez; Ludwig R Alvarez; Alfredo Mite; Jean P Andrade; José R Alvarez; Paola E Vargas; Nancy E Tomalá; Alex F Vivas; Jorge A Zapatier
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2002 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy, bile duct injury and the British and Irish surgeon.

Authors:  J Torkington; R T Chalmers; J Horner
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct. A cause for concern.

Authors:  A R Moossa; D W Easter; E Van Sonnenberg; G Casola; H D'Agostino
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  [Animal experiment studies of pedicled small intestine transplantation as partial extrahepatic bile duct replacement].

Authors:  T Böttger; B Mann; B Pickel; W Weber; K Sorger; T Junginger
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Chir       Date:  1991

6.  Does surgical experience influence mastectomy complications?

Authors:  I C Funnell; P J Crowe; D M Dent
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  The cystohepatic ducts: surgical implications.

Authors:  J Champetier; C Létoublon; I Alnaasan; B Charvin
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.246

8.  Routine fluoroscopic cholangiography during laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an argument.

Authors:  E W Bruhn; F J Miller; J G Hunter
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Fundus-first laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  I G Martin; S P Dexter; J Marton; J Gibson; J Asker; A Firullo; M J McMahon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Accidental lesions of the common bile duct at cholecystectomy. II. Results of treatment.

Authors:  A Andrén-Sandberg; S Johansson; S Bengmark
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 12.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.