Literature DB >> 15622006

Surgeon specialty and operative mortality with lung resection.

Philip P Goodney1, F L Lucas, Therese A Stukel, John D Birkmeyer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to examine the effect of subspecialty training on operative mortality following lung resection. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: While several different surgical subspecialists perform lung resection for cancer, many believe that this procedure is best performed by board-certified thoracic surgeons.
METHODS: Using the national Medicare database 1998 to 1999, we identified patients undergoing lung resection (lobectomy or pneumonectomy) for lung cancer. Operating surgeons were identified by unique physician identifier codes contained in the discharge abstract. We used the American Board of Thoracic Surgery database, as well as physician practice patterns, to designate surgeons as general surgeons, cardiothoracic surgeons, or noncardiac thoracic surgeons. Using logistic regression models, we compared operative mortality across surgeon subspecialties, adjusting for patient, surgeon, and hospital characteristics.
RESULTS: Overall, 25,545 Medicare patients underwent lung resection, 36% by general surgeons, 39% by cardiothoracic surgeons, and 25% by noncardiac thoracic surgeons. Patient characteristics did not differ substantially by surgeon specialty. Adjusted operative mortality rates were lowest for cardiothoracic and noncardiac thoracic surgeons (7.6% general surgeons, 5.6% cardiothoracic surgeons, 5.8% noncardiac thoracic surgeons, P = 0.001). In analyses restricted to high-volume surgeons (>20 lung resections/y), mortality rates were lowest for noncardiac thoracic surgeons (5.1% noncardiac thoracic, 5.2% cardiothoracic, and 6.1% general surgeons) (P < 0.01 for difference between general surgeons and thoracic surgeons). In analyses restricted to high-volume hospitals (>45 lung resections/y), mortality rates were again lowest for noncardiac thoracic surgeons (5.0% noncardiac thoracic, 5.3% cardiothoracic, and 6.1% general surgeons) (P < 0.01 for differences between all 3 groups).
CONCLUSIONS: Operative mortality with lung resection varies by surgeon specialty. Some, but not all, of this variation in operative mortality is attributable to hospital and surgeon volume.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15622006      PMCID: PMC1356861          DOI: 10.1097/01.sla.0000149428.17238.03

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   12.969


  19 in total

1.  Hospital volume and surgical mortality in the United States.

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer; Andrea E Siewers; Emily V A Finlayson; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; Ida Batista; H Gilbert Welch; David E Wennberg
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-04-11       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 2.  Is volume related to outcome in health care? A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature.

Authors:  Ethan A Halm; Clara Lee; Mark R Chassin
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2002-09-17       Impact factor: 25.391

Review 3.  Physician staffing patterns and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Peter J Pronovost; Derek C Angus; Todd Dorman; Karen A Robinson; Tony T Dremsizov; Tammy L Young
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2002-11-06       Impact factor: 56.272

4.  Does the subspecialty of the surgeon performing primary colonic resection influence the outcome of patients with hepatic metastases referred for resection?

Authors:  S J Wigmore; K Madhavan; E J Currie; D C Bartolo; O J Garden
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 12.969

5.  Association of surgical specialty and processes of care with patient outcomes for carotid endarterectomy.

Authors:  E L Hannan; A J Popp; P Feustel; E Halm; G Bernardini; J Waldman; D Shah; M R Chassin
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 6.  Adjustments for center in multicenter studies: an overview.

Authors:  A R Localio; J A Berlin; T R Ten Have; S E Kimmel
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2001-07-17       Impact factor: 25.391

7.  Comparative efficacy of positron emission tomography with FDG and computed tomographic scanning in preoperative staging of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  N C Gupta; G M Graeber; J S Rogers; H A Bishop
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Is surgery getting safer? National trends in operative mortality.

Authors:  Philip P Goodney; Andrea E Siewers; Therese A Stukel; F Lee Lucas; David E Wennberg; John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 6.113

9.  Surgeon specialty is associated with outcome in rectal cancer treatment.

Authors:  Thomas E Read; Robert J Myerson; James W Fleshman; Robert D Fry; Elisa H Birnbaum; Bruce J Walz; Ira J Kodner
Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 4.585

10.  Surgeon volume as an indicator of outcomes after carotid endarterectomy: an effect independent of specialty practice and hospital volume.

Authors:  John A Cowan; Justin B Dimick; B Gregory Thompson; James C Stanley; Gilbert R Upchurch
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.113

View more
  32 in total

1.  Improving lung cancer outcomes by improving the quality of surgical care.

Authors:  Raymond U Osarogiagbon; Thomas A D'Amico
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

Review 2.  What is quality, and can we define it in lung cancer?-the case for quality improvement.

Authors:  Farhood Farjah; Frank C Detterbeck
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

3.  Management patterns in acute low back pain: the role of physical therapy.

Authors:  Alfred Campbell Gellhorn; Leighton Chan; Brook Martin; Janna Friedly
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  Risk and benefit: the eternal Yin and Yang of thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Alex G Little
Journal:  Thorax       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 9.139

5.  Outcomes of esophagectomy according to surgeon's training: general vs. thoracic.

Authors:  Brian R Smith; Marcelo W Hinojosa; Kevin M Reavis; Ninh T Nguyen
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Lung cancer care: the impact of facilities and area measures.

Authors:  Christopher S Lathan
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2015-08

7.  Impact of hospital teaching status on survival from ruptured abdominal aortic aneurysm repair.

Authors:  Robert A Meguid; Benjamin S Brooke; Bruce A Perler; Julie A Freischlag
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2009-05-15       Impact factor: 4.268

8.  Improving outcomes with lung cancer surgery: selective referral or quality improvement?

Authors:  John D Birkmeyer
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  (Video Assisted) thoracoscopic surgery: Getting started.

Authors:  Tamas F Molnar
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.407

10.  Impact of intraoperative lung-protective interventions in patients undergoing lung cancer surgery.

Authors:  Marc Licker; John Diaper; Yann Villiger; Anastase Spiliopoulos; Virginie Licker; John Robert; Jean-Marie Tschopp
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2009-03-24       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.