Literature DB >> 7924023

Initial stability of porous coated acetabular implants. The effect of screw placement, screw tightness, defect type, and oversize implants.

M H Hadjari1, J M Hollis, O E Hofmann, C M Flahiff, C L Nelson.   

Abstract

The effects of screw location, screw tightness, acetabular bony defects, and implant size on the initial stability of porous coated acetabular implants was studied in vitro using 12 fresh frozen cadaver pelves. The fixation of porous coated acetabular implants was compared following fixation with either rim or center screws. Implants were tested first under axial and torsional stress. Then, either a peripheral or central bony defect was created in the acetabulum and testing was repeated in a similar fashion. Rim screws were noted to significantly improve the initial fixation of implants in intact acetabula and in acetabula with central bony defects. It was also shown that the tightness of the screws is an important factor affecting the strength of fixation. Although bony defects compromise the fixation of implants, specimens with central defects were very stable, particularly when tested with axial load. Acetabula with peripheral defects lost significant stability. The use of larger implants in acetabula with bony defects was shown to increase bony coverage and the overall implant stability.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7924023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  8 in total

1.  Effects of screw eccentricity on the initial stability of the acetabular cup.

Authors:  Jui-Ting Hsu; Chih-Han Chang; Kai-Nan An; Mark E Zobitz; Rapin Phimolsarnti; Ronald R Hugate; Kuo-An Lai
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  Metropolitan and micropolitan statistical area estimates of depression and anxiety using the Patient Health Questionnaire-8 in the 2006 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.

Authors:  Tara W Strine; Satvinder S Dhingra; Kurt Kroenke; Mohamed Qayad; James L Ribble; Catherine A Okoro; Lina S Balluz; Shanta R Dube; James Lando; Ali H Mokdad
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  [Reconstruction of large acetabular defects using trabecular metal augments].

Authors:  Olaf Hasart; Carsten Perka; Rex Lehnigk; Stephan Tohtz
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 1.154

4.  Protrusio After Medial Acetabular Wall Breach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Christopher T Martin; Anneliese D Heiner; Thomas E Baer; Andrew J Pugely; Nicolas O Noiseux
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2015

5.  Does osteoporosis reduce the primary tilting stability of cementless acetabular cups?

Authors:  Christoph von Schulze Pellengahr; Lars V von Engelhardt; Bernd Wegener; Peter E Müller; Andreas Fottner; Patrick Weber; Ole Ackermann; Matthias Lahner; Wolfram Teske
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2015-04-21       Impact factor: 2.362

6.  The optimal screw-hole positions of the eccentric revision cup based on a morphological study.

Authors:  Yanchao Zhang; Haiyang Ma; Yang Liu; Junmin Shen; Bohan Zhang; Yonggang Zhou
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 2.677

7.  A cementless, elastic press-fit socket with and without screws.

Authors:  Dean Pakvis; Joan Luites; Gijs van Hellemondt; Maarten Spruit
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2012-10       Impact factor: 3.717

8.  Primary stability of two uncementedacetabular components of different geometry: hemispherical or peripherallyenhanced?

Authors:  G Antoniades; E J Smith; A H Deakin; S C Wearing; M Sarungi
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2013-12-10       Impact factor: 5.853

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.