Literature DB >> 26361450

Protrusio After Medial Acetabular Wall Breach in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Christopher T Martin1, Anneliese D Heiner2, Thomas E Baer1, Andrew J Pugely1, Nicolas O Noiseux3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Medial protrusio is a recognized complication of total hip arthroplasty, but it is not known if a medial wall breach during cup implantation increases the risk. We thus investigated the effect of up to a 2 cm defect in the medial acetabular wall in a cadaveric model. Separately, we investigated the ability of acetabular screws to rescue the construct.
METHODS: Nine human fresh-frozen hemipelves were reamed medially to create the defect, implanted with acetabular cups, and then loaded to failure. The nine contralateral hemipelves were reamed in a standard fashion and served as controls. Separately, nine hemipelves with a medial defect were augmented with two acetabular screws each, then loaded to failure, with the contralateral side as a control. Load-to-failure, stiffness, and energy were recorded.
FINDINGS: The presence of a medial wall defect decreased the load-to-failure by a mean of 26% (5710 v. 4221 N, p=0.024). The addition of two acetabular screws did not rescue the construct (mean 27% decrease, 4082 v. 2985 N, p=0.024). The majority of specimens failed in a supra-physiologic range of force. Bone density correlated with failure loads (R(2) range of 0.54-0.78), and osteoporotic specimens were more likely to fail at a physiologic range, consistent with forces experienced during minor stumbles or falls.
INTERPRETATION: Osteoporotic patients with a medial wall defect after hip arthroplasty may be susceptible to fracture during activities of daily living. Protected weight bearing with an assistive device may be reasonable in order to minimize fall risk until cup ingrowth is achieved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 26361450      PMCID: PMC4492152     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iowa Orthop J        ISSN: 1541-5457


  30 in total

1.  Acetabular micromotion as a measure of initial implant stability in primary hip arthroplasty. An in vitro comparison of different methods of initial acetabular component fixation.

Authors:  P G Perona; J Lawrence; W G Paprosky; A G Patwardhan; M Sartori
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of acetabular cup implantation in cementless total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Kate A Margalit; Kei Hayashi; Josh Jackson; Sun Young Kim; Tanya C Garcia; K Tomo Wiggans; Sean Aiken; Susan M Stover
Journal:  Vet Surg       Date:  2010-08-12       Impact factor: 1.495

Review 3.  Acetabular prosthetic protrusion and sepsis: case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  James B Stiehl
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Intrapelvic protrusion of the acetabular component following total hip replacement. 1975.

Authors:  Eduardo A Salvati; Peter Bullough; Philip D Wilson
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Intrapelvic cementless component extraction with immediate triflange acetabular reconstruction using the retroperitoneal approach.

Authors:  Scott Foster; Haleem Chaudhary; Benjamin Assenmacher
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2008-06-13       Impact factor: 4.757

6.  Early postoperative acetabular discontinuity after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Gaurav Desai; Michael D Ries
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 4.757

Review 7.  Protrusio acetabuli: diagnosis and treatment.

Authors:  M T McBride; M P Muldoon; R F Santore; R T Trousdale; D R Wenger
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2001 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.020

8.  Single column locking plate fixation is inadequate in two column acetabular fractures. A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Kiarash Khajavi; Arthur T Lee; Derek P Lindsey; Philipp Leucht; Michael J Bellino; Nicholas J Giori
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2010-05-09       Impact factor: 2.359

9.  Biomechanical evaluation of transverse acetabular fracture fixation.

Authors:  N Shazar; R J Brumback; V P Novak; S M Belkoff
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1998-07       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Identification and management of pelvic discontinuity.

Authors:  D J Berry
Journal:  Orthopedics       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 1.390

View more
  3 in total

1.  Comparison of the stability of three fixation techniques between porous metal acetabular components and augments.

Authors:  N A Beckmann; R G Bitsch; M Gondan; M Schonhoff; S Jaeger
Journal:  Bone Joint Res       Date:  2018-05-05       Impact factor: 5.853

2.  Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With Acetabular Protrusio.

Authors:  Danielle Greig; Peter P Hsiue; Clark J Chen; Rishi Trikha; Amir Khoshbin; Alexandra I Stavrakis
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev       Date:  2020-07

3.  Revision Hip Arthroplasty in Patient with Acetabulum Migration into Subperitoneal Space-A Case Report.

Authors:  Andrzej Kotela; Jacek Lorkowski; Dariusz Chmielewski; Marta Grodzik; Ireneusz Kotela
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2020-12-31       Impact factor: 2.430

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.