Literature DB >> 7896444

Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: support for breast-cancer mortality reduction. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (NETB).

H J De Koning1, J Fracheboud, R Boer, A L Verbeek, H J Collette, J H Hendriks, B M van Ineveld, A E de Bruyn, P J van der Maas.   

Abstract

The nation-wide 2-yearly breast-cancer screening programme in The Netherlands, for women aged 50-69, started around 1988, and was predicted to result eventually in a 16% reduction in breast-cancer mortality in the total female population. We present the results of screening up to January 1, 1993, and compare these with the predicted results from the cost-effectiveness analysis, on which basis this mortality reduction has been calculated. At least 550,000 women aged 50-69 were invited to screening in 1990-1992, and 75% of these participated. Cancer was suspected from 5,162 examinations and further investigation was therefore required. Excision biopsy was done in 72% of referrals, and 2,515 breast cancers were detected. The results for 404,000 newly invited women compare favourably with expected values (in parentheses): 78% attendance rate (70%), 1.4% screen positive (1.6%), 6.8 cancers detected per 1,000 women screened (6.4) and 38% of these cancers were DCIS or invasive carcinomas smaller than 11 mm in diameter (36%). More data, e.g., on treatment and interval cancers, will follow in the years to come. These first results can be interpreted as strong early signs of a reduction in breast-cancer mortality of at least the predicted size. Screening has sufficiently advanced the diagnosis, as well as or better than expected. Breast cancers diagnosed in this age group without screening are diagnosed at a worse stage than expected. Unfavourable side-effects, especially false-positive referrals, might be kept lower than those reported in other countries.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7896444     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910600608

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  15 in total

1.  Mammography in New Hampshire: characteristics of the women and the exams they receive.

Authors:  P A Carney; M E Goodrich; D M O'Mahony; A N Tosteson; M S Eliassen; S P Poplack; S Birnbaum; B G Harwood; K A Burgess; B T Berube; W S Wells; J P Ball; M M Stevens
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2000-06

2.  [Introduction of a mammography screening program in Germany. Consideration of benefits and risks].

Authors:  E A Nekolla; J Griebel; G Brix
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 0.635

3.  Quantitative estimates of the impact of sensitivity and specificity in mammographic screening in Germany.

Authors:  P G Warmerdam; H J de Koning; R Boer; P M Beemsterboer; M L Dierks; E Swart; B P Robra
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Redesigning primary care processes to improve the offering of mammography. The use of clinic protocols by nonphysicians.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M U Yood; M B Bolton; E A Boohaker; C H MacWilliam; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Distressed or relieved? Psychological side effects of breast cancer screening in The Netherlands.

Authors:  W Scaf-Klomp; R Sanderman; H B van de Wiel; R Otter; W J van den Heuvel
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 3.710

6.  Women at risk of ovarian cancer: attitudes towards and expectations of the familial ovarian cancer clinic.

Authors:  R Sheppard; A Fry; R Rush; C M Steel; A Cull
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 2.375

7.  International variation in screening mammography interpretations in community-based programs.

Authors:  Joann G Elmore; Connie Y Nakano; Thomas D Koepsell; Laurel M Desnick; Carl J D'Orsi; David F Ransohoff
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-09-17       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Information dynamics in living systems: prokaryotes, eukaryotes, and cancer.

Authors:  B Roy Frieden; Robert A Gatenby
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Mammographic screening after the age of 65 years: early outcomes in the Nijmegen programme.

Authors:  J van Dijck; A Verbeek; J Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Seventeen-year evaluation of breast cancer screening: the DOM project, The Netherlands. Diagnostisch Onderzoek (investigation) Mammacarcinoom.

Authors:  G A Miltenburg; P H Peeters; J Fracheboud; H J Collette
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.