Literature DB >> 14574013

Women at risk of ovarian cancer: attitudes towards and expectations of the familial ovarian cancer clinic.

R Sheppard1, A Fry, R Rush, C M Steel, A Cull.   

Abstract

Familial ovarian cancer clinics are a recent development and little is known about the characteristics of women who attend. One hundred and ninety-seven women with a family history of ovarian cancer completed a questionnaire prior to their initial attendance at the Familial Ovarian Cancer Clinic in Edinburgh. Issues relating to screening procedures were the most commonly cited barriers to attendance, with a proportion finding gynaecological examination embarrassing (17.0%) or uncomfortable (18.0%). Expectations of the clinic were high in terms of access to resources and information. The vast majority of women would prefer to have regular screening (94.7%) and genetic testing (93.2%) if it were available. Attitudes to prophylactic surgery and chemoprevention were more diverse, but would be considered by 54.3% and 43.9% of respondents respectively. Although the current screening procedure for ovarian cancer is of unproven efficacy, a high proportion of women believed in its ability to reduce mortality (77.9%) and to detect tumours at an early stage (65.8%). There was a trend for women to believe this more strongly at follow-up. This study highlights the need to make women more aware of the limitations of current ovarian cancer screening techniques, particularly where the alternative management strategy of prophylactic surgery might otherwise be dismissed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 14574013     DOI: 10.1023/a:1011539800994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Cancer        ISSN: 1389-9600            Impact factor:   2.375


  18 in total

1.  Family history of breast cancer and screening behavior: an inverted U-shaped curve?

Authors:  B J Hailey
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.538

2.  Psychological impact of screening for familial ovarian cancer: reactions to initial assessment.

Authors:  G Erlick Robinson; B P Rosen; L N Bradley; W G Rockert; M L Carr; D E Cole; K J Murphy
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  An ecological study of the effectiveness of mammography in reducing breast cancer mortality.

Authors:  G S Cooper; Z Yuan; S J Bowlin; L K Dennis; R Kelly; H Chen; A A Rimm
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Coping disposition, perceived risk, and psychological distress among women at increased risk for ovarian cancer.

Authors:  M D Schwartz; C Lerman; S M Miller; M Daly; A Masny
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Nation-wide breast cancer screening in The Netherlands: support for breast-cancer mortality reduction. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening (NETB).

Authors:  H J De Koning; J Fracheboud; R Boer; A L Verbeek; H J Collette; J H Hendriks; B M van Ineveld; A E de Bruyn; P J van der Maas
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1995-03-16       Impact factor: 7.396

6.  Psychosocial issues raised by a familial ovarian cancer register.

Authors:  J Green; F Murton; H Statham
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.318

Review 7.  Screening for ovarian, prostatic, and testicular cancers.

Authors:  J Austoker
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-07-30

8.  What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre?

Authors:  L J Fallowfield; A Rodway; M Baum
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 18.000

9.  The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women's risk perceptions and levels of distress.

Authors:  A Cull; E D Anderson; S Campbell; J Mackay; E Smyth; M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Cancer risk perceptions and distress among women attending a familial ovarian cancer clinic.

Authors:  A Cull; A Fry; R Rush; C M Steel
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2001-03-02       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  1 in total

1.  Risk perception after genetic counseling in patients with increased risk of cancer.

Authors:  Johanna Rantala; Ulla Platten; Gunilla Lindgren; Bo Nilsson; Brita Arver; Annika Lindblom; Yvonne Brandberg
Journal:  Hered Cancer Clin Pract       Date:  2009-08-23       Impact factor: 2.857

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.