Literature DB >> 9192253

Redesigning primary care processes to improve the offering of mammography. The use of clinic protocols by nonphysicians.

B D McCarthy1, M U Yood, M B Bolton, E A Boohaker, C H MacWilliam, M J Young.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop, within the framework of continuous quality improvement, new processes for offering mammography and determine whether protocols executed completely by nonphysicians would increase mammography utilization.
DESIGN: A prospective follow-up study with patients from an intervention clinic and two control clinics.
SETTING: Three general internal medicine clinics in a large, urban teaching hospital in Detroit, Michigan. PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS: A total of 5,934 women, aged 40 through 75 years, making 16,546 visits to one of the clinics during the study period (September 1, 1992, through November 31, 1993). INTERVENTION: Medical assistants and licensed practical nurses in the intervention clinic were trained to identify women due for screening mammography, and to directly offer and order a mammogram if patients agreed.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Patients were considered up-to-date with screening if they had a mammogram within 1 year (if age 50-75) or 2 years (if age 40-49) prior to the visit or a mammogram within 60 days after the visit. The proportion of visits each month in which a woman was up-to-date with mammography was calculated using computerized billing records. Prior to the intervention, the proportion of visits in which women were up-to-date was 68% (95% confidence interval [CI] 63%, 73%) in the intervention clinic and 66% (95% CI 61%, 71%) in each of the control clinics. At the end of the evaluation, there was an absolute increase of 9% (95% CI 2%, 16%) in the intervention clinic, and a difference of 1% (95% CI -5%, 7%) in one of the control clinics and -2% (95% CI -3%, 5%) in the other. In the intervention clinic, the proportion of visits in which women were up-to-date with mammography increased over time and was consistent with a linear trend (p = .004).
CONCLUSIONS: Redesigning clinic processes to make offering of mammography by medical assistants and licensed practical nurses a routine part of the clinic encounter can lead to mammography rates that are superior to those seen in physicians' usual practice, even when screening levels are already fairly high. Physicians need not be considered the sole, or even the primary, member of the health care team who can effectively deliver some preventive health measures.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9192253      PMCID: PMC1497119          DOI: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.1997.00060.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  37 in total

1.  Mammography usage and the health belief model.

Authors:  J A Stein; S A Fox; P J Murata; D E Morisky
Journal:  Health Educ Q       Date:  1992

2.  Compliance with guidelines for mammography screening.

Authors:  V L Champion
Journal:  Cancer Detect Prev       Date:  1992

3.  Use of mammography--United States, 1990.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  1990-09-14       Impact factor: 17.586

4.  The American Cancer Society Guidelines for the cancer-related checkup: an update.

Authors:  C Mettlin; G D Dodd
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  1991 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 508.702

5.  The effect of patient-carried reminder cards on the performance of health maintenance measures.

Authors:  R C Turner; L E Waivers; K O'Brien
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-03

6.  Corporate-sponsored breast cancer screening at the work site: results of a statewide program.

Authors:  H B Kessler; B K Rimer; P J Devine; R A Gatenby; P F Engstrom
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  The effect of physician-patient communication on mammography utilization by different ethnic groups.

Authors:  S A Fox; J A Stein
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 2.983

8.  The impact of physician compliance on screening mammography for older women.

Authors:  S A Fox; P J Murata; J A Stein
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1991-01

9.  Computer-generated physician and patient reminders. Tools to improve population adherence to selected preventive services.

Authors:  S M Ornstein; D R Garr; R G Jenkins; P F Rust; A Arnon
Journal:  J Fam Pract       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 0.493

10.  Breast cancer screening among women from 65 to 74 years of age in 1987-88 and 1991. NCI Breast Cancer Screening Consortium.

Authors:  E A Coleman; E J Feuer
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  10 in total

1.  Identifying and Addressing Language Needs in Primary Care: a Pilot Implementation Study.

Authors:  Jessica E Murphy; David Washington; Ziming Xuan; Michael K Paasche-Orlow; Mari-Lynn Drainoni
Journal:  J Racial Ethn Health Disparities       Date:  2018-12-03

2.  Intervention to increase mammography utilization in a public hospital.

Authors:  T C Davis; H J Berkel; C L Arnold; I Nandy; R H Jackson; P W Murphy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Improving rescreening in community clinics: does a system approach work?

Authors:  Regina Otero-Sabogal; Desi Owens; Jesse Canchola; Farzaneh Tabnak
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2006-12

4.  Increasing breast and cervical cancer screening in low-income women.

Authors:  K L Margolis; N Lurie; P G McGovern; M Tyrrell; J S Slater
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  A Lung Cancer Screening Education Program Impacts both Referral Rates and Provider and Medical Assistant Knowledge at Two Federally Qualified Health Centers.

Authors:  Aamna Akhtar; Ernesto Sosa; Samuel Castro; Melissa Sur; Vanessa Lozano; Gail D'Souza; Sophia Yeung; Jonjon Macalintal; Meghna Patel; Xiaoke Zou; Pei-Chi Wu; Ellen Silver; Jossie Sandoval; Stacy W Gray; Karen L Reckamp; Jae Y Kim; Virginia Sun; Dan J Raz; Loretta Erhunmwunsee
Journal:  Clin Lung Cancer       Date:  2021-12-12       Impact factor: 4.840

6.  A medical assistant-based program to promote healthy behaviors in primary care.

Authors:  Robert L Ferrer; Priti Mody-Bailey; Carlos Roberto Jaén; Sherrie Gott; Sara Araujo
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2009 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 5.166

7.  Pilot trial of a licensed practical nurse intervention for hypertension and depression.

Authors:  Hillary R Bogner; Heather F de Vries; Elise M Kaye; Knashawn H Morales
Journal:  Fam Med       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 1.756

Review 8.  Interventions to enhance breast cancer screening, diagnosis, and treatment among racial and ethnic minority women.

Authors:  Christopher M Masi; Dionne J Blackman; Monica E Peek
Journal:  Med Care Res Rev       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 3.929

Review 9.  Improving health care quality for racial/ethnic minorities: a systematic review of the best evidence regarding provider and organization interventions.

Authors:  Mary Catherine Beach; Tiffany L Gary; Eboni G Price; Karen Robinson; Aysegul Gozu; Ana Palacio; Carole Smarth; Mollie Jenckes; Carolyn Feuerstein; Eric B Bass; Neil R Powe; Lisa A Cooper
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2006-04-24       Impact factor: 3.295

10.  Interprofessional Education Curriculum for Medical Assistants in Radiation Oncology: A Single Institution Pilot Program.

Authors:  Sumi Sinha; Melody J Xu; Emily Yee; Troy Buckmeier; Catherine Park; Steve E Braunstein
Journal:  Adv Radiat Oncol       Date:  2021-09-10
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.