Literature DB >> 7893696

Protonation of Glu L212 following QB- formation in the photosynthetic reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides: evidence from time-resolved infrared spectroscopy.

R Hienerwadel1, S Grzybek, C Fogel, W Kreutz, M Y Okamura, M L Paddock, J Breton, E Nabedryk, W Mäntele.   

Abstract

The protonation events that occur upon QA-QB-->QAQB- electron transfer in photosynthetic reaction centers from Rhodobacter sphaeroides were investigated by time-resolved infrared spectroscopy using tunable diode lasers as previously described [Mäntele, W., Hienerwadel, R., Lenz, F., Riedel, E. J., Grisar, R., & Tacke, M. (1990) Spectrosc. Int. 2, 29-35; Hienerwadel, R., Thibodeau, D. L., Lenz, F., Nabedryk, E., Breton, J., Kreutz, W., & Mäntele, W. (1992) Biochemistry 31, 5799-5808]. In the mid-infrared region between 1695 and 1780 cm-1, transient signals associated with QA-QB-->QAQB- electron transfer were observed and characterized. The dominant transient absorbance changes are three positive signals at 1732, 1725, and 1706 cm-1 and two negative signals at 1716 and at 1698 cm-1. The 1725 cm-1-signal disappears upon 1H-->2H exchange as expected for an accessible COOH group and is absent in Glu L212 Gln mutant reaction centers. On this basis, we propose an assignment of this signal to the COOH group of Glu L212. The other signals could correspond to intensity changes and/or shifts of other carboxylic residues, although contributions from ester C = O groups of bacteriopheophytins cannot be ruled out. In native reaction centers at pH 7 and at 4 degrees C, biphasic kinetics of the transient components were observed at most frequencies. The major signal at 1725 cm-1 exhibits a fast kinetic component of t 1/2 = 0.18 ms (25% of the total amplitude) and a slow one of t1/2 = 1 ms (75% of the total amplitude). A global fit analysis of the signals between 1695 and 1780 cm-1 revealed that the spectral distributions of the fast and the slow components are different. Biphasic kinetics with comparable half-times were also observed for the Glu L212 to Gln mutant. The simplest model to explain these results is that the fast phase represents electron transfer and the slow phase represents proton transfer and/or conformational changes coupled to electron transfer. The difference spectra of the slow component from native reaction centers show that the 1725 cm-1 band corresponds to an absorbance increase and not to a shift of an existing band. The signal is therefore proposed to arise from the protonation of Glu L212. The amplitude of the 1725 cm-1 signal varies distinctly with pH as expected for protonation of a COO- group. With increasing pH, the amplitude of the slow component increases while that of the fast component decreases slightly.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7893696     DOI: 10.1021/bi00009a013

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochemistry        ISSN: 0006-2960            Impact factor:   3.162


  19 in total

1.  Key role of proline L209 in connecting the distant quinone pockets in the reaction center of Rhodobacter sphaeroides.

Authors:  J Tandori; P Maroti; E Alexov; P Sebban; L Baciou
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Induced conformational changes upon Cd2+ binding at photosynthetic reaction centers.

Authors:  Hiroshi Ishikita; Ernst-Walter Knapp
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-10-27       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Trapped conformational states of semiquinone (D+*QB-*) formed by B-branch electron transfer at low temperature in Rhodobacter sphaeroides reaction centers.

Authors:  M L Paddock; M Flores; R Isaacson; C Chang; E C Abresch; P Selvaduray; M Y Okamura
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2006-11-28       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 4.  Photosystem II: structure and mechanism of the water:plastoquinone oxidoreductase.

Authors:  Jan Kern; Gernot Renger
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2007-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 5.  Investigating the mechanisms of photosynthetic proteins using continuum electrostatics.

Authors:  G Matthias Ullmann; Edda Kloppmann; Timm Essigke; Eva-Maria Krammer; Astrid R Klingen; Torsten Becker; Elisa Bombarda
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 6.  Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy.

Authors:  Catherine Berthomieu; Rainer Hienerwadel
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 3.573

7.  Electrostatic calculations of amino acid titration and electron transfer, Q-AQB-->QAQ-B, in the reaction center.

Authors:  P Beroza; D R Fredkin; M Y Okamura; G Feher
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Molecular mechanisms for generating transmembrane proton gradients.

Authors:  M R Gunner; Muhamed Amin; Xuyu Zhu; Jianxun Lu
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2013-03-16

9.  Measuring electrostatic fields in both hydrogen-bonding and non-hydrogen-bonding environments using carbonyl vibrational probes.

Authors:  Stephen D Fried; Sayan Bagchi; Steven G Boxer
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 15.419

10.  Evidence from FTIR difference spectroscopy of an extensive network of hydrogen bonds near the oxygen-evolving Mn(4)Ca cluster of photosystem II involving D1-Glu65, D2-Glu312, and D1-Glu329.

Authors:  Rachel J Service; Warwick Hillier; Richard J Debus
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 3.162

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.