Literature DB >> 7885818

Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection.

R Hübner1, E R Hafter.   

Abstract

Detection of auditory signals under frequency uncertainty can be improved by presenting cues to the listeners. Since various cues have been found to differ in effectiveness, three conceivable mechanisms were considered which might account for these differences. Cuing might reduce the number and/or width of the employed auditory filters or listening bands. Also, cues could modulate the precision of frequency tuning of the filters. Psychometric functions were collected in a detection experiment with frequency uncertainty employing three kinds of cues: pure tones whose frequency was identical to that of the signal (iconic cues), complex tones with a missing fundamental equal to the signal (complex cues), and pure tones with a certain frequency relation to the signal (relative cues). Compared with a no-cue condition, all cue types improved detection performance. Fitting models to the data suggests that in the no-cue condition as well as the complex-cue condition, multiple bands were utilized, and that the iconic and relative cues induced single-band listening. There is no indication that accuracy of frequency tuning was responsible for cue-efficiency differences.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7885818     DOI: 10.3758/bf03206506

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Percept Psychophys        ISSN: 0031-5117


  8 in total

1.  Listening bandwidths and frequency uncertainty in pure-tone signal detection.

Authors:  R S Schlauch; E R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Effective attenuation of signals in noise under focused attention.

Authors:  H P Dai; B Scharf; S Buus
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Information extraction from contralateral cues in the detection of signals of uncertain frequency.

Authors:  J D Gilliom; W M Mills
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Decision rules in detection of simple and complex tones.

Authors:  S Buus; E Schorer; M Florentine; E Zwicker
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Frequency-response characteristic of auditory observers detecting signals of a single frequency in noise: the probe-signal method.

Authors:  G Z Greenberg; W D Larkin
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-12       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  The role of frequency versus informational cues in uncertain frequency detection.

Authors:  J H Howard; A J O'Toole; S E Rice
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Attending to auditory filters that were not stimulated directly.

Authors:  E R Hafter; R S Schlauch; J Tang
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Pattern-directed attention in uncertain-frequency detection.

Authors:  J H Howard; A J O'Toole; R Parasuraman; K B Bennett
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1984-03
  8 in total
  10 in total

1.  Enhancement, extension, and reversal of the frequency selectivity effect.

Authors:  Todd A Mondor; Jennifer Hurlburt; Lisa Gammell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

Review 2.  Attention to memory: orienting attention to sound object representations.

Authors:  Kristina C Backer; Claude Alain
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2013-12-20

3.  Auditory attention to frequency and time: an analogy to visual local-global stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy Justus; Alexandra List
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01-06

Review 4.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Bottom-up driven involuntary attention modulates auditory signal in noise processing.

Authors:  Lothar Lagemann; Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Teismann; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 3.288

6.  On the number of auditory filter outputs needed to understand speech: further evidence for auditory channel independence.

Authors:  Frédéric Apoux; Eric W Healy
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2009-06-16       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Involuntary monitoring of sound signals in noise is reflected in the human auditory evoked N1m response.

Authors:  Lothar Lagemann; Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Teismann; Christo Pantev
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Music-induced cortical plasticity and lateral inhibition in the human auditory cortex as foundations for tonal tinnitus treatment.

Authors:  Christo Pantev; Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Teismann
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-27

9.  Frequency-specific modulation of population-level frequency tuning in human auditory cortex.

Authors:  Hidehiko Okamoto; Henning Stracke; Pienie Zwitserlood; Larry E Roberts; Christo Pantev
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-01-06       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  On the generalization of tones: A detailed exploration of non-speech auditory perception stimuli.

Authors:  Michael Schutz; Jessica Gillard
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.