Literature DB >> 1939898

Listening bandwidths and frequency uncertainty in pure-tone signal detection.

R S Schlauch1, E R Hafter.   

Abstract

The effect of frequency uncertainty on the detection of tonal signals in noise was studied using a modified probe-signal method. Widths of the listening bands used during detection were measured directly, allowing for an analysis that separates the effects of having to monitor multiple independent bands from those due to limited frequency resolution. Uncertainty was varied by beginning each trial with a cue consisting of one, two, or four randomly chosen, simultaneously presented tones. An expected signal, whose frequency matched one of the components in a cue, was presented on a majority of trials. However, on remaining trials, the signal was a probe, which meant that its frequency differed from one of the components in the cue by a constant ratio. Performance as measured in percent correct declined for probes at increasingly distant ratios from the expected values. The results were converted to dB using individual psychometric functions for expected signals and listening bands were fitted using the rounded exponential filter of Patterson et al. [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 72, 1788-1803 (1982)]. The obtained bandwidths are comparable to those reported using notched-noise maskers, but there is a small but consistent increase in bandwidth with increased numbers of components in the cues. The primary results is that the effects due to uncertainty are well described by a 1-of-M orthogonal band model, which takes into consideration limitations of the detector, including the widths of the listening bands.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1939898     DOI: 10.1121/1.401925

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  18 in total

1.  Enhancement, extension, and reversal of the frequency selectivity effect.

Authors:  Todd A Mondor; Jennifer Hurlburt; Lisa Gammell
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2003-06

2.  Stimulus uncertainty and insensitivity to pitch-change direction.

Authors:  Samuel R Mathias; Christophe Micheyl; Peter J Bailey
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Predicting the path of a changing sound: velocity tracking and auditory continuity.

Authors:  Poppy A C Crum; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Are you listening? Brain activation associated with sustained nonspatial auditory attention in the presence and absence of stimulation.

Authors:  Anna Seydell-Greenwald; Adam S Greenberg; Josef P Rauschecker
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-08-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Octave effect in auditory attention.

Authors:  Tobias Borra; Huib Versnel; Chantal Kemner; A John van Opstal; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Auditory attention to frequency and time: an analogy to visual local-global stimuli.

Authors:  Timothy Justus; Alexandra List
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2005-01-06

7.  The effect of frequency cueing on the perceptual segregation of simultaneous tones: Bottom-up and top-down contributions.

Authors:  Yi Shen
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection.

Authors:  R Hübner; E R Hafter
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

9.  Allocating attention to frequency regions.

Authors:  T A Mondor; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-09

10.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.