Literature DB >> 1918627

Effective attenuation of signals in noise under focused attention.

H P Dai1, B Scharf, S Buus.   

Abstract

When attending to a tone at a given frequency, listeners are most sensitive to that tone and others within a restricted band of frequencies surrounding it. This region of enhanced sensitivity defines the attention band that was measured in two experiments using a modified version of the probe-signal method of Greenberg and Larkin [J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 44, 1513-1523 (1968)]. Experiment 1 showed that at five center frequencies, from 0.25 to 4.0 kHz, the shape of the attention band resembles that of the auditory filter as inferred from notched-noise masking experiments by other investigators. The width of the attention band is close to the critical band at higher frequencies, but only half as wide at 0.25 and 0.5 kHz. Experiment 2 produced psychometric functions for unattended probe tones at least 0.23 kHz away from a fully attended, 1-kHz target tone. From these functions, the effective attenuation, measured as the threshold difference between the 1-kHz target and the probes, was estimated to be 7 dB; the amount of attenuation appeared to be about the same regardless of how far the probe frequency was from the attended band. One interpretation of these results is that bands centered on the unattended tones contribute to the decision process with some small but measurable weight and are not entirely ignored.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1918627     DOI: 10.1121/1.400721

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  29 in total

1.  Predicting the path of a changing sound: velocity tracking and auditory continuity.

Authors:  Poppy A C Crum; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Critical bands and critical ratios in animal psychoacoustics: an example using chinchilla data.

Authors:  William A Yost; William P Shofner
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Octave effect in auditory attention.

Authors:  Tobias Borra; Huib Versnel; Chantal Kemner; A John van Opstal; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Effect of signal-temporal uncertainty in children and adults: tone detection in noise or a random-frequency masker.

Authors:  Angela Yarnell Bonino; Lori J Leibold; Emily Buss
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Auditory attentional filter in the absence of masking noise.

Authors:  Elan Selvi Anandan; Ruby Husain; Kumar Seluakumaran
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-01-03       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Dimension-selective attention as a possible driver of dynamic, context-dependent re-weighting in speech processing.

Authors:  Lori L Holt; Adam T Tierney; Giada Guerra; Aeron Laffere; Frederic Dick
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 3.208

7.  Cuing mechanisms in auditory signal detection.

Authors:  R Hübner; E R Hafter
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-02

8.  Allocating attention to frequency regions.

Authors:  T A Mondor; A S Bregman
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-09

9.  Effects of cross-modal selective attention on the sensory periphery: cochlear sensitivity is altered by selective attention.

Authors:  S Srinivasan; A Keil; K Stratis; K L Woodruff Carr; D W Smith
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  The Effect of Remote Masking on the Reception of Speech by Young School-Age Children.

Authors:  Carla L Youngdahl; Eric W Healy; Sarah E Yoho; Frédéric Apoux; Rachael Frush Holt
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 2.297

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.