Literature DB >> 7880753

Reproductive and menstrual factors in relation to mammographic parenchymal patterns among perimenopausal women.

I T Gram1, E Funkhouser, L Tabar.   

Abstract

The relationship between mammographic patterns and reproductive and menstrual factors was examined in 3640 Norwegian women, aged 40-56 years, participating in the Third Tromsö study conducted in 1986-87. Epidemiological data were obtained from questionnaires. The mammograms were categorised into five groups. This categorisation is based on anatomic-mammographic correlations, following three-dimensional (thick slice technique) histopathologic-mammographic comparisons, rather than simple pattern reading. Patterns 1-3 were combined into a low-risk group and patterns 4 and 5 into a high-risk group for analysis. Women who had more than four children were 90% less likely to have a high-risk pattern than nulliparous women (OR = 0.09, 95% CI 0.04-0.16) controlling for age, weight, height and menopausal status. Furthermore, those who first gave birth over 34 years of age were more than twice as likely to have a high-risk pattern than those giving birth in their teens (OR = 2.37, 95% CI 1.23-4.56) adjusting for parity. Among post-menopausal women, age at menarche was negatively (P for trend = 0.015) and late age at menopause positively (P for trend = 0.072) related to high-risk patterns. Among premenopausal women, age at menarche was positively related to high-risk patterns (P for trend = 0.001). Also, menopausal status rather than age was associated with high-risk patterns. These findings support the opinion that reproductive and menstrual factors are involved in determining the mammographic parenchymal pattern among perimenopausal women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7880753      PMCID: PMC2033639          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1995.128

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  27 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic parenchymal patterns and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  A F Saftlas; M Szklo
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 2.  Mammographic parenchymal pattern and breast cancer risk: a critical appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  P J Goodwin; N F Boyd
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Factors associated with mammographic pattern.

Authors:  J S Grove; M J Goodman; F I Gilbert; M P Mi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 3.039

4.  Breast cancer risk associated with reproductive factors and breast parenchymal patterns.

Authors:  F de Waard; J J Rombach; H J Collette; B Slotboom
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1984-06       Impact factor: 13.506

5.  Breast patterns as an index of risk for developing breast cancer.

Authors:  J N Wolfe
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Lactation and breast cancer. Evidence for a negative association in premenopausal women.

Authors:  T Byers; S Graham; T Rzepka; J Marshall
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-05       Impact factor: 4.897

7.  The relation of mammographic features of the breast to breast cancer risk factors.

Authors:  J Brisson; N L Sadowsky; J A Twaddle; A S Morrison; P Cole; F Merletti
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-03       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  Reproductive risk factors in a prospective study of breast cancer: the Nurses' Health Study.

Authors:  B Rosner; G A Colditz; W C Willett
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 4.897

9.  Epidemiologic determinants of the mammographic parenchymal pattern. A population-based study within a mammographic screening program.

Authors:  L Bergkvist; L Tabàr; R Bergström; H O Adami
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1987-12       Impact factor: 4.897

10.  Relationship between risk factors for breast cancer and hormonal status.

Authors:  T G Hislop; A J Coldman; J M Elwood; D H Skippen; L Kan
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 7.196

View more
  15 in total

Review 1.  Physical activity and mammographic breast density: a systematic review.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Kathleen Wolin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Mammographic breast density and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women according to the time since the mammogram.

Authors:  Lusine Yaghjyan; Graham A Colditz; Bernard Rosner; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 4.254

3.  Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Francesmary Modugno; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study.

Authors:  Gillian S Dite; Lyle C Gurrin; Graham B Byrnes; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Margaret R E McCredie; Dallas R English; Graham G Giles; Jennifer Cawson; Robert A Hegele; Anna M Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; John L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.254

5.  Relationship between breast cancer risk factors and mammographic breast density in the Fernald Community Cohort.

Authors:  L Yaghjyan; M C Mahoney; P Succop; R Wones; J Buckholz; S M Pinney
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 6.  Epidemiologic studies of isoflavones & mammographic density.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Martijn Verheus; Jeffrey A Tice
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer.

Authors:  Inger T Gram; Yngve Bremnes; Giske Ursin; Gertraud Maskarinec; Nils Bjurstam; Eiliv Lund
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-08-25       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States).

Authors:  Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Anna N A Tosteson; Claudia Kasales; Julia Weiss; Martha Goodrich; Elizabeth E Hatch; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.506

9.  Prospective screening study of 0.5 Tesla dedicated magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in young, high-risk women.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein; Jean J Latimer; Jules H Sumkin; Michelle Huerbin; Stephen G Grant; Victor G Vogel
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 2.809

10.  Physical activity and mammographic density in a cohort of postmenopausal Norwegian women; a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Samera Azeem Qureshi; Merete Ellingjord-Dale; Solveig Hofvind; Anna H Wu; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2012-12-21
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.