Literature DB >> 4063637

Factors associated with mammographic pattern.

J S Grove, M J Goodman, F I Gilbert, M P Mi.   

Abstract

Wolfe's criteria were assigned to mammograms of 202 women without breast cancer. Parity decreased the frequency of P2 patterns but not DY. P1 and N1 patterns apparently increased at the expense of P2 patterns. For every birth, the probability that a P2 pattern changed to P1 or N1 was roughly 7 or 8%. This effect was not limited to the first pregnancy, but also held for additional pregnancies. Low body weight was associated with dysplasia and prominent duct patterns. Reported declines of radiographic density with increasing age and/or menopause were confirmed. Ethnic group was unrelated to parenchymal pattern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1985        PMID: 4063637     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-58-685-21

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  15 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  Breast tissue composition and susceptibility to breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Michael Bronskill; Martin J Yaffe; Neb Duric; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2010-07-08       Impact factor: 13.506

3.  Dietary habits and mammographic patterns in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  E Nordevang; E Azavedo; G Svane; B Nilsson; L E Holm
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.872

4.  Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Francesmary Modugno; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Predictors of mammographic density: insights gained from a novel regression analysis of a twin study.

Authors:  Gillian S Dite; Lyle C Gurrin; Graham B Byrnes; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Margaret R E McCredie; Dallas R English; Graham G Giles; Jennifer Cawson; Robert A Hegele; Anna M Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; Norman F Boyd; John L Hopper
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  High-risk mammographic parenchymal patterns and anthropometric measures: a case-control study.

Authors:  E Sala; R Warren; J McCann; S Duffy; R Luben; N Day
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 7.  Mammographic density.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Martin Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 6.466

8.  Reproductive and menstrual factors in relation to mammographic parenchymal patterns among perimenopausal women.

Authors:  I T Gram; E Funkhouser; L Tabar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.640

9.  Genetic determinants of mammographic density.

Authors:  Christopher A Haiman; Leslie Bernstein; David Berg; Sue A Ingles; Martine Salane; Giske Ursin
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 6.466

Review 10.  Mammographic density. Potential mechanisms of breast cancer risk associated with mammographic density: hypotheses based on epidemiological evidence.

Authors:  Lisa J Martin; Norman F Boyd
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-09       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.