Literature DB >> 7064978

The relation of mammographic features of the breast to breast cancer risk factors.

J Brisson, N L Sadowsky, J A Twaddle, A S Morrison, P Cole, F Merletti.   

Abstract

The authors evaluated the relation of breast cancer risk factors to the appearance of the breast on xeromammograms. Subjects were 1021 women without breast cancer whose first xeromammographic examination at one of two Boston, Massachusetts, area hospitals was done for a reason described as "baseline" or "routine." The principal mammographic features assessed were the percentage of the breast showing nodular densities and the percentage showing homogeneous density. The extent of nodular and homogeneous densities decreased as age increased. The amount of both types of density decreased with increase in the number of full-term pregnancies. The percentages of the breast showing nodular and homogeneous densities were slightly higher for premenopausal compared to postmenopausal women, and for women with a history of breast biopsy or aspiration compared to women without. Certain characteristics of observed relations between risk factors and mammographic features differed for the two types of densities.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1982        PMID: 7064978     DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a113321

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  15 in total

Review 1.  Mammographic densities as a marker of human breast cancer risk and their use in chemoprevention.

Authors:  N F Boyd; L J Martin; J Stone; C Greenberg; S Minkin; M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.075

2.  Age at Menarche and Late Adolescent Adiposity Associated with Mammographic Density on Processed Digital Mammograms in 24,840 Women.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Jafi A Lipson; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Martin J Yaffe; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Valerie McGuire; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2017-07-11       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 3.  Reproductive Factors and Mammographic Density: Associations Among 24,840 Women and Comparison of Studies Using Digitized Film-Screen Mammography and Full-Field Digital Mammography.

Authors:  Stacey E Alexeeff; Nnaemeka U Odo; Russell McBride; Valerie McGuire; Ninah Achacoso; Joseph H Rothstein; Jafi A Lipson; Rhea Y Liang; Luana Acton; Martin J Yaffe; Alice S Whittemore; Daniel L Rubin; Weiva Sieh; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Mammographic density does not differ between unaffected BRCA1/2 mutation carriers and women at low-to-average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Gretchen L Gierach; Jennifer T Loud; Catherine K Chow; Sheila A Prindiville; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Peter W Soballe; Claudia Giambartolomei; Phuong L Mai; Claudia E Galbo; Kathryn Nichols; Kathleen A Calzone; Celine Vachon; Mitchell H Gail; Mark H Greene
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Menstrual and reproductive factors in relation to mammographic density: the Study of Women's Health Across the Nation (SWAN).

Authors:  Lesley M Butler; Ellen B Gold; Gail A Greendale; Carolyn J Crandall; Francesmary Modugno; Nina Oestreicher; Charles P Quesenberry; Laurel A Habel
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2007-12-09       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 6.  Can genes for mammographic density inform cancer aetiology?

Authors:  Linda E Kelemen; Thomas A Sellers; Celine M Vachon
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2008-09-05       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Breast cancer risk factors in relation to breast density (United States).

Authors:  Linda Titus-Ernstoff; Anna N A Tosteson; Claudia Kasales; Julia Weiss; Martha Goodrich; Elizabeth E Hatch; Patricia A Carney
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.506

8.  Prospective screening study of 0.5 Tesla dedicated magnetic resonance imaging for the detection of breast cancer in young, high-risk women.

Authors:  Wendy S Rubinstein; Jean J Latimer; Jules H Sumkin; Michelle Huerbin; Stephen G Grant; Victor G Vogel
Journal:  BMC Womens Health       Date:  2006-06-26       Impact factor: 2.809

9.  Low-fat high-carbohydrate diet and plasma sex hormones.

Authors:  T J Key
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Reproductive and menstrual factors in relation to mammographic parenchymal patterns among perimenopausal women.

Authors:  I T Gram; E Funkhouser; L Tabar
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.