Literature DB >> 1341530

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a review of 12,397 patients.

T R Scott1, K A Zucker, R W Bailey.   

Abstract

We reviewed the cumulative experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy reported in the surgical literature, including 12,397 patients selected to undergo laparoscopic cholecystectomy, 95% of which were performed on an elective basis. Although the indications for operation varied, 90% of patients had evidence of cholelithiasis and biliary colic. Conversion to open cholecystectomy was required in 534 patients (4%); of these, 52% were converted because of acute or chronic inflammation or adhesions. Laparoscopic cholangiography was attempted in 3,696 of 9,231 patients (40%) and was successful in 84%. The incidence of major bile duct injury, minor bile duct injury, bile leak, and overall morbidity was 0.3%, 0.1%, 0.4%, and 4%, respectively. The mortality rate was 0.08%. Results from individual reports indicate that 54% to 98% of patients were discharged on the 1st or 2nd postoperative day, and 77% to 98% returned to full activity within 7 to 14 days. The incidence of bile duct injury, overall morbidity, and mortality compare favorably with published reports for open cholecystectomy. The collective data would also indicate that laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a safe and efficacious procedure that offers a viable alternative to conventional cholecystectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1992        PMID: 1341530

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Laparosc Endosc        ISSN: 1051-7200


  52 in total

Review 1.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: early and late complications and their treatment.

Authors:  A Shamiyeh; W Wayand
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2004-05-05       Impact factor: 3.445

2.  Video-assisted surgery in gastric cancer.

Authors:  Josep Roig; Jordi Gironès; Elisenda Garsot; Manel Puig; Marcel Pujades; José I Rodríguez; Antoni Codina
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Improved outcome after laparoscopic cholecystectomy with ultrasonic dissection: a randomized multicenter trial.

Authors:  Yucel Cengiz; Jan Dalenbäck; Gunnar Edlund; Leif A Israelsson; Arthur Jänes; Mats Möller; Anders Thorell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic vs open gastrectomy. A retrospective review.

Authors:  C D Reyes; K J Weber; M Gagner; C M Divino
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-07-05       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Risk factors resulting in conversion of laparoscopic cholecystectomy to open surgery.

Authors:  N A Kama; M Doganay; M Dolapci; E Reis; M Atli; M Kologlu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Laparoscopic choledochoscopy with a small-caliber endoscope. A safe and effective technique for laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  W E Kelley; V C Sheridan
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Postoperative hypercoagulability and deep-vein thrombosis after laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J A Caprini; J I Arcelus; M Laubach; G Size; K N Hoffman; R W Coats; S Blattner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Primary versus delayed repair for bile duct injuries sustained during cholecystectomy: results of a survey of the Association Francaise de Chirurgie.

Authors:  Antonio Iannelli; Jacques Paineau; Antoine Hamy; Anne-Sophie Schneck; Caroline Schaaf; Jean Gugenheim
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 3.647

9.  Intrahepatic subcapsular biloma. A rare complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  J Cervantes; G A Rojas; R Ponte
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Laparoscopic subtotal cholecystectomy for severe cholecystitis.

Authors:  Jun Nakajima; Akira Sasaki; Toru Obuchi; Shigeaki Baba; Hiroyuki Nitta; Go Wakabayashi
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2009-09-27       Impact factor: 2.549

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.