Literature DB >> 7877290

Effect of frequency-altered feedback on stuttering frequency at normal and fast speech rates.

S Hargrave1, J Kalinowski, A Stuart, J Armson, K Jones.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the magnitude and direction of the frequency shift of frequency-altered auditory feedback (FAF) on stuttering frequency at both normal and fast speech rates. Twelve adult male and 2 adult female subjects who stutter read 10 different passages at either a normal or fast speech rate under nonaltered auditory feedback (NAF) and each of four FAF conditions in which the feedback signal was shifted: up one-half octave; up one octave; down one-half octave; and down one octave. Mean stuttering frequency for NAF was significantly higher than mean stuttering frequencies for all FAF conditions (p < 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences between the FAF conditions (p > 0.05). Subjects exhibited significantly more disfluencies under the fast speech rate condition relative to the normal speech rate condition. Future research should examine the relationship between frequency shifts of less than one-half octave and stuttering amelioration.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7877290     DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3706.1313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Speech Hear Res        ISSN: 0022-4685


  9 in total

1.  Dynamics of self-monitoring and error detection in speech production: evidence from mental imagery and MEG.

Authors:  Xing Tian; David Poeppel
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.225

2.  Does Time Compression Decrease Intelligibility for Female Talkers More Than for Male Talkers?

Authors:  Eric M Johnson; Shae D Morgan; Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.297

3.  Effect of Speaking Environment on Speech Production and Perception.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  J Hum Environ Syst       Date:  2008-11

4.  Utterance rate and linguistic properties as determinants of lexical dysfluencies in children who stutter.

Authors:  P Howell; J Au-Yeung; L Pilgrim
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 5.  Sensory feedback control of mammalian vocalizations.

Authors:  Michael S Smotherman
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Effects of delayed auditory feedback and frequency-shifted feedback on speech control and some potentials for future development of prosthetic aids for stammering.

Authors:  Peter Howell
Journal:  Stammering Res       Date:  2004-04-01

7.  Immediate speech fluency improvement after application of the Digital Speech Aid in stuttering patients.

Authors:  Joanna Ratyńska; Agata Szkiełkowska; Renata Markowska; Marek Kurkowski; Marzena Mularzuk; Henryk Skarżyński
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-01

8.  Functional lateralization of speech processing in adults and children who stutter.

Authors:  Yutaka Sato; Koichi Mori; Toshizo Koizumi; Yasuyo Minagawa-Kawai; Akihiro Tanaka; Emi Ozawa; Yoko Wakaba; Reiko Mazuka
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-04-27

Review 9.  The Role of Rhythm in Speech and Language Rehabilitation: The SEP Hypothesis.

Authors:  Shinya Fujii; Catherine Y Wan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-10-13       Impact factor: 3.169

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.