Literature DB >> 19321638

Electromyographic responses from the hindlimb muscles of the decerebrate cat to horizontal support surface perturbations.

Claire F Honeycutt1, Jinger S Gottschall, T Richard Nichols.   

Abstract

The sensory and neural mechanisms underlying postural control have received much attention in recent decades but remain poorly understood. Our objectives were 1) to establish the decerebrate cat as an appropriate model for further research into the sensory mechanisms of postural control and 2) to observe what elements of the postural response can be generated by the brain stem and spinal cord. Ten animals were decerebrated using a modified premammillary technique, which consists of a premammillary decerebration that is modified with a vertical transection near the subthalamic nucleus to eliminate spontaneous locomotion. Horizontal support surface perturbations were applied to all four limbs and electromyographic recordings were collected from 14 muscles of the right hindlimb. Muscle activation was quantified with tuning curves, which compared increases and decreases in muscle activity to background and graphed the difference against perturbation direction. Parallels were drawn between these tuning curves, which were further quantified with a principal direction and breadth (range of directions of muscle activation), and data collected by other researchers from the intact animal. We found a strong similarity in the direction and breadth of the tuning curves generated in the decerebrate and intact cat. These results support our hypothesis that directionally specific tuning of muscles in response to support surface perturbations does not require the cortex, further indicating a strong role for the brain stem and spinal cord circuits in mediating directionally appropriate muscle activation patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19321638      PMCID: PMC2694113          DOI: 10.1152/jn.91040.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  64 in total

1.  Weight support and balance during perturbed stance in the chronic spinal cat.

Authors:  J M Macpherson; J Fung
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Local loss of proprioception results in disruption of interjoint coordination during locomotion in the cat.

Authors:  T A Abelew; M D Miller; T C Cope; T R Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Ratio of shear to load ground-reaction force may underlie the directional tuning of the automatic postural response to rotation and translation.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; Jane M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-04-14       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Is lower leg proprioception essential for triggering human automatic postural responses?

Authors:  B R Bloem; J H Allum; M G Carpenter; F Honegger
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Central suppression of regenerated proprioceptive afferents.

Authors:  Valerie K Haftel; Edyta K Bichler; Qing-Bo Wang; Jonathan F Prather; Martin J Pinter; Timothy C Cope
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-11       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Improvement in linearity and regulation of stiffness that results from actions of stretch reflex.

Authors:  T R Nichols; J C Houk
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 7.  Regulation of stiffness by skeletomotor reflexes.

Authors:  J C Houk
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 19.318

8.  Determinants of postural orientation in quadrupedal stance.

Authors:  J Fung; J M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  Adapting reflexes controlling the human posture.

Authors:  L M Nashner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1976-08-27       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Postural performance in decerebrated rabbit.

Authors:  P E Musienko; P V Zelenin; V F Lyalka; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  2008-02-16       Impact factor: 3.332

View more
  46 in total

1.  Somatosensory control of balance during locomotion in decerebrated cat.

Authors:  Pavel Musienko; Gregoire Courtine; Jameson E Tibbs; Vyacheslav Kilimnik; Alexandr Savochin; Alan Garfinkel; Roland R Roy; V Reggie Edgerton; Yury Gerasimenko
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Muscle spindle responses to horizontal support surface perturbation in the anesthetized cat: insights into the role of autogenic feedback in whole body postural control.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; Paul Nardelli; Timothy C Cope; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Directional constraint of endpoint force emerges from hindlimb anatomy.

Authors:  Nathan E Bunderson; J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting; Thomas J Burkholder
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Evidence for reticulospinal contributions to coordinated finger movements in humans.

Authors:  Claire Fletcher Honeycutt; Michael Kharouta; Eric Jon Perreault
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-07-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  The mechanical actions of muscles predict the direction of muscle activation during postural perturbations in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-12-04       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Disruption of cutaneous feedback alters magnitude but not direction of muscle responses to postural perturbations in the decerebrate cat.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-16       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neural mechanisms of single corrective steps evoked in the standing rabbit.

Authors:  L-J Hsu; P V Zelenin; V F Lyalka; M G Vemula; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2017-02-12       Impact factor: 3.590

8.  The decerebrate cat generates the essential features of the force constraint strategy.

Authors:  Claire F Honeycutt; T Richard Nichols
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2010-01-20       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Modules in the brain stem and spinal cord underlying motor behaviors.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; Vincent C K Cheung; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Facilitation of postural limb reflexes with epidural stimulation in spinal rabbits.

Authors:  P E Musienko; P V Zelenin; G N Orlovsky; T G Deliagina
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.