Literature DB >> 17980370

Functional muscle synergies constrain force production during postural tasks.

J Lucas McKay1, Lena H Ting.   

Abstract

We recently demonstrated that a set of five functional muscle synergies were sufficient to characterize both hindlimb muscle activity and active forces during automatic postural responses in cats standing at multiple postural configurations. This characterization depended critically upon the assumption that the endpoint force vector (synergy force vector) produced by the activation of each muscle synergy rotated with the limb axis as the hindlimb posture varied in the sagittal plane. Here, we used a detailed, 3D static model of the hindlimb to confirm that this assumption is biomechanically plausible: as we varied the model posture, simulated synergy force vectors rotated monotonically with the limb axis in the parasagittal plane (r2=0.94+/-0.08). We then tested whether a neural strategy of using these five functional muscle synergies provides the same force-generating capability as controlling each of the 31 muscles individually. We compared feasible force sets (FFSs) from the model with and without a muscle synergy organization. FFS volumes were significantly reduced with the muscle synergy organization (F=1556.01, p<<0.01), and as posture varied, the synergy-limited FFSs changed in shape, consistent with changes in experimentally measured active forces. In contrast, nominal FFS shapes were invariant with posture, reinforcing prior findings that postural forces cannot be predicted by hindlimb biomechanics alone. We propose that an internal model for postural force generation may coordinate functional muscle synergies that are invariant in intrinsic limb coordinates, and this reduced-dimension control scheme reduces the set of forces available for postural control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17980370      PMCID: PMC4350792          DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2007.09.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  42 in total

1.  A comparison of models explaining muscle activation patterns for isometric contractions.

Authors:  B M van Bolhuis; C C Gielen
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 2.  Internal models for motor control and trajectory planning.

Authors:  M Kawato
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1999-12       Impact factor: 6.627

3.  Human arm movements described by a low-dimensional superposition of principal components.

Authors:  T D Sanger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2000-02-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Octopuses use a human-like strategy to control precise point-to-point arm movements.

Authors:  Germán Sumbre; Graziano Fiorito; Tamar Flash; Binyamin Hochner
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2006-04-18       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 5.  Motor primitives in vertebrates and invertebrates.

Authors:  Tamar Flash; Binyamin Hochner
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2005-11-04       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Quantifying deficits in the 3D force capabilities of a digit caused by selective paralysis: application to the thumb with simulated low ulnar nerve palsy.

Authors:  Laurel Kuxhaus; Stephanie S Roach; Francisco J Valero-Cuevas
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.712

7.  Reference frames for representing visual and tactile locations in parietal cortex.

Authors:  Marie Avillac; Sophie Denève; Etienne Olivier; Alexandre Pouget; Jean-René Duhamel
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Biomechanical capabilities influence postural control strategies in the cat hindlimb.

Authors:  J Lucas McKay; Thomas J Burkholder; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2006-12-06       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Strategies that simplify the control of quadrupedal stance. I. Forces at the ground.

Authors:  J M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Determinants of postural orientation in quadrupedal stance.

Authors:  J Fung; J M Macpherson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 6.167

View more
  37 in total

1.  Task-level feedback can explain temporal recruitment of spatially fixed muscle synergies throughout postural perturbations.

Authors:  Seyed A Safavynia; Lena H Ting
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Extracting synergies in gait: using EMG variability to evaluate control strategies.

Authors:  Rajiv Ranganathan; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-06-20       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Directional constraint of endpoint force emerges from hindlimb anatomy.

Authors:  Nathan E Bunderson; J Lucas McKay; Lena H Ting; Thomas J Burkholder
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-06-15       Impact factor: 3.312

4.  Robustness of muscle synergies underlying three-dimensional force generation at the hand in healthy humans.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; William Z Rymer; Randall F Beer
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2012-01-25       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Neuromechanics of muscle synergies for posture and movement.

Authors:  Lena H Ting; J Lucas McKay
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2008-03-04       Impact factor: 6.627

6.  Simplified and effective motor control based on muscle synergies to exploit musculoskeletal dynamics.

Authors:  Max Berniker; Anthony Jarc; Emilio Bizzi; Matthew C Tresch
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Motor variability: within-subject correlations during separate and simultaneous contractions.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Devin V Dinenno; Bjørn Jørgensen; Seth J Welsh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Neurofacilitation of Developmental Reaction (NFDR) approach: a practice framework for integration / modification of early motor behavior (Primitive Reflexes) in Cerebral Palsy.

Authors:  Meenakshi Batra; Vijai Prakash Sharma; Vijay Batra; Gyanendra Kumar Malik; Ravindra Mohan Pandey
Journal:  Indian J Pediatr       Date:  2011-08-10       Impact factor: 1.967

9.  Modules in the brain stem and spinal cord underlying motor behaviors.

Authors:  Jinsook Roh; Vincent C K Cheung; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-08       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Merging of healthy motor modules predicts reduced locomotor performance and muscle coordination complexity post-stroke.

Authors:  David J Clark; Lena H Ting; Felix E Zajac; Richard R Neptune; Steven A Kautz
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-09       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.