Literature DB >> 7869022

Differential vocalization in budgerigars: towards an experimental analysis of naming.

K Manabe1, T Kawashima, J E Staddon.   

Abstract

In Experiment 1, 3 budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) were trained with food reinforcement to make low- or high-frequency calls in response to different color stimuli, C1 and C2 (a color-naming task), using a gradual response-differentiation procedure and an automatic call-recognition system. Thus, a call within a certain frequency band was reinforced in the presence of C1 ("C1 call"), and a call within a different band was reinforced in the presence of C2 ("C2 call"). In Experiment 2, all 3 budgerigars were trained in a form-to-color matching-to-sample task, alternating trial by trial with either the color-naming task (2 birds) or an identity color matching-to-sample task (1 bird). Sample stimuli for the new matching-to-sample task were forms (F1 or F2) and comparisons were the same two colors (C1 and C2). Given Sample F1 or F2, birds had to make a call to produce Comparison Pair C1 and C2. With F1 as the sample, a peck on C1 was reinforced; with F2 as the sample, a peck on C2 was reinforced. Although no particular call was specified in the presence of F1 and F2, 2 birds made the C1 call in the presence of F1 and the C2 call in the presence of F2. In Experiment 3, the bird that failed to match form and color calls in Experiment 2 and another bird were first trained in a color-to-form matching-to-sample task: C1 to F3 and C2 to F4. In this task, to produce the comparison pair of forms, a high call (or low for the other bird) was required in the presence of C1, and a low call (or high) was required in the presence of C2. Both birds were then trained with an identity matching-to-sample task in which sample and comparison stimuli were the same two forms, F3 and F4. Trials on the identity task alternated with the color-to-form trials. Although no particular call was required in the presence of Samples F3 and F4, both birds came to make the C1 call in the presence of F3 and the C2 call in the presence of F4. Our technique promises to be useful for the study of emergent vocal relations in budgerigars and other animals.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7869022      PMCID: PMC1334383          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1995.63-111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  8 in total

1.  Conditioned vocalization in the budgerigar.

Authors:  N GINSBURG
Journal:  J Comp Physiol Psychol       Date:  1960-04

2.  Perception of distance calls by budgerigars (Melopsittacus undulatus) and zebra finches (Poephila guttata): assessing species-specific advantages.

Authors:  K Okanoya; R J Dooling
Journal:  J Comp Psychol       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 2.231

3.  Response coding in recall of colours by monkeys.

Authors:  D Gaffan
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol       Date:  1977-11       Impact factor: 2.143

4.  Reading and crossmodal transfer of stimulus equivalences in severe retardation.

Authors:  M Sidman; O Cresson
Journal:  Am J Ment Defic       Date:  1973-03

5.  Reading and auditory-visual equivalences.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1971-03

6.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  In the beginning was the "name".

Authors:  H S Terrace
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1985-09

8.  Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences.

Authors:  J C de Rose; W J McIlvane; W V Dube; V C Galpin; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

  8 in total
  18 in total

1.  Experimental analysis of human vocal behavior: applications of speech-recognition technology.

Authors:  O Wirth; P N Chase; K J Munson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers.

Authors:  C R Kastak; R J Schusterman; D Kastak
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency.

Authors:  M Sidman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 4.  Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Mark Galizio; Thomas S Critchfied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Reflections on naming and other symbolic behavior.

Authors:  C F Lowe; P J Horne
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Some tests of response membership in acquired equivalence classes.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Karen Lionello-DeNolf; Sarah Michalek; Marco Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Testing response-stimulus equivalence relations using differential responses as a sample.

Authors:  Hirofumi Shimizu
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Associative symmetry, antisymmetry, and a theory of pigeons' equivalence-class formation.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-11       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  On the origins of emergent differential sample behavior.

Authors:  Peter J Urcuioli; Marco Vasconcelos
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2008-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Membership of Defined Responses in Stimulus Classes.

Authors:  Karen M Lionello-Denolf; Paula Braga-Kenyon
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2013-09-22
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.