Literature DB >> 10966100

Equivalence relations and the reinforcement contingency.

M Sidman1.   

Abstract

Where do equivalence relations come from? One possible answer is that they arise directly from the reinforcement contingency. That is to say, a reinforcement contingency produces two types of outcome: (a) 2-, 3-, 4-, 5-, or n-term units of analysis that are known, respectively, as operant reinforcement, simple discrimination, conditional discrimination, second-order conditional discrimination, and so on; and (b) equivalence relations that consist of ordered pairs of all positive elements that participate in the contingency. This conception of the origin of equivalence relations leads to a number of new and verifiable ways of conceptualizing equivalence relations and, more generally, the stimulus control of operant behavior. The theory is also capable of experimental disproof.

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10966100      PMCID: PMC1284788          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.2000.74-127

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  20 in total

1.  Differences in development of visual and auditory-visual equivalence relations.

Authors:  G Green
Journal:  Am J Ment Retard       Date:  1990-11

2.  Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: A theoretical analysis of control by negative stimuli.

Authors:  P F Carrigan; M Sidman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Conditional discrimination and equivalence relations: Control by negative stimuli.

Authors:  C Johnson; M Sidman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Development of conditional and equivalence relations without differential consequences.

Authors:  R J Harrison; G Green
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Do parakeets exhibit derived stimulus control? Some thoughts on experimental control procedures.

Authors:  K J Saunders; D C Williams
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Instructional control of generalized relational matching to sample in children.

Authors:  B Lowenkron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Stimulus class formation and stimulus-reinforcer relations.

Authors:  W V Dube; W J McIlvane; R W Maguire; H A Mackay; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Conditional discrimination vs. matching to sample: an expansion of the testing paradigm.

Authors:  M Sidman; W Tailby
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Coding responses and the generalization of matching to sample in children.

Authors:  B Lowenkron
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Emergent simple discrimination established by indirect relation to differential consequences.

Authors:  J C de Rose; W J McIlvane; W V Dube; V C Galpin; L T Stoddard
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  94 in total

1.  Stability of functional equivalence and stimulus equivalence: effects of baseline reversals.

Authors:  Oliver Wirth; Philip N Chase
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Equivalence classification by California sea lions using class-specific reinforcers.

Authors:  C R Kastak; R J Schusterman; D Kastak
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  The competition-among-relations-in-nominals theory of conceptual combination: implications for stimulus class formation and class expansion.

Authors:  Christina L Gagné
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  Naming and categorization in young children: vocal tact training.

Authors:  C Fergus Lowe; Pauline J Horne; Fay D A Harris; Valerie R L Randle
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Sea lions and equivalence: expanding classes by exclusion.

Authors:  Colleen Reichmuth Kastak; Ronald J Schusterman
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

Review 6.  Categorization, concept learning, and behavior analysis: an introduction.

Authors:  Thomas R Zentall; Mark Galizio; Thomas S Critchfied
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Contextual control of equivalence-based transformation of functions.

Authors:  Michael Dougher; David R Perkins; David Greenway; Ashton Koons; Carmenne Chiasson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Membership of Defined Responses in Stimulus Classes.

Authors:  Karen M Lionello-Denolf; Paula Braga-Kenyon
Journal:  Psychol Rec       Date:  2013-09-22

10.  Naming and categorization in young children: v. manual sign training.

Authors:  Pauline J Horne; C Fergus Lowe; Fay D A Harris
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.