Literature DB >> 7865034

The Medical Council of Canada's key features project: a more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills.

G Page1, G Bordage.   

Abstract

In 1986 the Medical Council of Canada (MCC) commissioned a six-year research and development project to create a new, more valid written examination of clinical decision-making skills for the Canadian Qualifying Examination in Medicine. At that time, the qualifying examination consisted of three booklets of multiple-choice questions and one booklet of patient management problems administered over a two-day period. All graduates of Canadian and foreign medical schools must pass this examination before practicing medicine anywhere in Canada except Québec. The project was undertaken because (1) numerous studies do not support the use of patient management problems (PMPs) to assess clinical decision-making skills, and (2) research results on the characteristics of clinical decision-making skills offered guidance to develop new approaches to their assessment. In particular, research suggested that these skills are specific to the case or problem encountered and are contingent on the effective manipulation of a few elements of the problem that are crucial to its successful resolution--the problem's key features. The problems developed by this project focused only on the assessment of these key features. The project was implemented in three overlapping phases over a six-year period, 1986-1992, each containing a development component followed by a pilot test through which the research studies were carried out. The pilot tests were conducted by presenting sets of new key feature problems to classes of graduating students in medical schools across Canada.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7865034     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-199502000-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acad Med        ISSN: 1040-2446            Impact factor:   6.893


  28 in total

1.  Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: key-feature approach.

Authors:  Kathrine Lawrence; Tim Allen; Carlos Brailovsky; Tom Crichton; Cheri Bethune; Michel Donoff; Tom Laughlin; Stephen Wetmore; Marie-Pierre Carpentier; Shaun Visser
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  An innovative method to assess clinical reasoning skills: Clinical reasoning tests in the second national medical science Olympiad in Iran.

Authors:  Mitra Amini; Mohsen Moghadami; Javad Kojuri; Hamidreza Abbasi; Ali Arhami Doolat Abadi; Nezar Ali Molaee; Elham Pishbin; Hamid Reza Javadzade; Vahid Monsef Kasmaee; Hasan Vakili; Mohamad Ali Reis Sadat; Roghaye Akbari; Bita Omidvar; Afshin Shafaghi; Marzie Dehbozorgian; Mohammad Morad Jafari; Alireza Monajemi; Kamran Soltani Arabshahi; Peyman Adibi; Bernard Charlin
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2011-10-17

Review 3.  Development of an office of teaching, learning and assessment in a pharmacy school.

Authors:  Wendy Duncan-Hewitt; Paul Jungnickel; R Lee Evans
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-04-15       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 4.  Integrating performance assessment, maintenance of competence, and continuing professional development of community pharmacists.

Authors:  Nancy E Winslade; Robyn M Tamblyn; Laurel K Taylor; Lambert W T Schuwirth; Cees P M Van der Vleuten
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 2.047

5.  The semi-structured triple jump--a new assessment tool reflects qualifications of tutors in a PBL course on basic pharmacology.

Authors:  Jan Matthes; Alexander Look; Amina K Hahne; Ara Tekian; Stefan Herzig
Journal:  Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol       Date:  2008-01-11       Impact factor: 3.000

Review 6.  Emerging opportunities for educational partnerships between managed care organizations and academic health centers.

Authors:  D B Nash; J J Veloski
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-05

Review 7.  Recent developments in assessing medical students.

Authors:  S L Fowell; J G Bligh
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1998-01       Impact factor: 2.401

8.  Using Automatic Item Generation to Create Solutions and Rationales for Computerized Formative Testing.

Authors:  Mark J Gierl; Hollis Lai
Journal:  Appl Psychol Meas       Date:  2017-08-26

9.  Defining competency-based evaluation objectives in family medicine: procedure skills.

Authors:  Stephen Wetmore; Tom Laughlin; Kathrine Lawrence; Michel Donoff; Tim Allen; Carlos Brailovsky; Tom Crichton; Cheri Bethune
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 10.  Assessment of competence in pediatric gastrointestinal endoscopy.

Authors:  Catharine M Walsh
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2014-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.