Literature DB >> 786371

Energy metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae discrepancy between ATP balance and known metabolic functions.

R Lagunas.   

Abstract

The contribution of metabolic pathways to the catabolism of glucose, galactose and ethanol by Saccharomyces cerevisiae in aerobiosis has been studied. The results suggest that: 1. Of the total ATP formed in catabolism yeast obtain as much as 60% from ethylic fermentation during logarithmic growth on glucose. However, about 80% of ATP is formed in oxidation of galactose. Oxidation seems to be the only important catabolic pathway of ethanol. 2. The ratios between growth yield and ATP formed in catabolism were approx. 9, 7 and 3 g dry yeast/mol ATP in glucose, galactose and ethanol cultures, respectively. 3. The balance between ATP produced in catabolism of substrates and the requirements of ATP for the biosynthesis of cellular material indicates that as much as 60% of ATP is spent in functions other than net biosynthesis. 4. The rate of ATP expenditure in non net-biosynthetic functions during growth was approx. 20 mmol/g dry yeast per h. 5. In conditions in which no growth occurred but cell viability was maintained, that is, in the absence of exogenous carbon and nitrogen source, the ATP production rate was approx. 1 mmol ATP/g dry yeast per h. 6. These results indicate that the ATP required for maintaining the yeast alive, what would be considered maintenance energy "sensu stricto", is only a minor proportion of the ATP spent in non net-biosynthetic functions during growth. The identification of the processes related to growth which spend more energy than that required for net biosynthesis could lead to important insights in cell biology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1976        PMID: 786371     DOI: 10.1016/0005-2728(76)90049-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta        ISSN: 0006-3002


  21 in total

1.  A theoretical evaluation of growth yields of yeasts.

Authors:  C Verduyn; A H Stouthamer; W A Scheffers; J P van Dijken
Journal:  Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 2.271

2.  Experimental evidence for kinetic proofreading in the aminoacylation of tRNA by synthetase.

Authors:  T Yamane; J J Hopfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1977-06       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Energetic irrelevance of aerobiosis for S. cerevisiae growing on sugars.

Authors:  R Lagunas
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1979-11-01       Impact factor: 3.396

4.  Influence of cosubstrate concentration on xylose conversion by recombinant, XYL1-expressing Saccharomyces cerevisiae: a comparison of different sugars and ethanol as cosubstrates.

Authors:  N Q Meinander; B Hahn-Hägerdal
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.792

5.  Intracellular ATP in a glucosephosphate isomerase mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  N N Ugarova; C Romay; I Garcia; C Pascual
Journal:  Folia Microbiol (Praha)       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 2.099

6.  Mitochondrial resistance to miconazole in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  F Portillo; C Gancedo
Journal:  Mol Gen Genet       Date:  1985

7.  Characterization of the plasma membrane ATPase of Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  R Serrano
Journal:  Mol Cell Biochem       Date:  1978-11-30       Impact factor: 3.396

8.  A continuous culture study of an ATPase-negative mutant of Escherichia coli.

Authors:  A H Stouthamer; C W Bettenhaussen
Journal:  Arch Microbiol       Date:  1977-06-20       Impact factor: 2.552

9.  Dynamics of glycolytic regulation during adaptation of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to fermentative metabolism.

Authors:  Joost van den Brink; André B Canelas; Walter M van Gulik; Jack T Pronk; Joseph J Heijnen; Johannes H de Winde; Pascale Daran-Lapujade
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2008-07-18       Impact factor: 4.792

10.  The critical size of gold nanoparticles for overcoming P-gp mediated multidrug resistance.

Authors:  Yuqian Jiang; Zheng Wang; Wei Duan; Lingyan Liu; Mahan Si; Xiaoyuan Chen; Chen-Jie Fang
Journal:  Nanoscale       Date:  2020-06-17       Impact factor: 7.790

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.