Paul J Fletcher1,2,3, Fiona D Zeeb4,5, Caleb J Browne4,6, Guy A Higgins7,8, Ashlie D Soko4. 1. Section of Biopsychology and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada. Paul.Fletcher@camh.ca. 2. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Paul.Fletcher@camh.ca. 3. Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. Paul.Fletcher@camh.ca. 4. Section of Biopsychology and Campbell Family Mental Health Research Institute, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, 250 College Street, Toronto, ON, M5T 1R8, Canada. 5. Department of Psychiatry, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 6. Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 7. Department of Pharmacology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada. 8. InterVivo Solutions Inc., Toronto, Canada.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: These experiments examined the effects of selective 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor ligands on responding for a conditioned reinforcer (CRf). Effects of these ligands were measured under basal conditions and following elevated dopamine (DA) activity produced by the DA reuptake inhibitor methylphenidate. METHODS: Water-restricted rats learned to associate a conditioned stimulus (CS) with water in operant chambers. Subsequently, two response levers were made available; responding on one lever delivered the CS (now a CRf), while responding on the second lever had no consequences. The effects of agonist and antagonists of 5-HT1A (8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT) and N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY100635)), 5-HT2A (DOI and M100907) and 5-HT2C (Ro60-0175 and SB242084) receptors on responding were examined alone, as well as in the presence of methylphenidate. RESULTS: Responding for a CRf was reduced by the agonists 8-OH-DPAT, DOI and Ro60-0175. 8-OH-DPAT also reduced responding for water and seemed to impair responding in a non-specific fashion. None of the receptor antagonists affected responding. Methylphenidate dose-dependently enhanced responding for a CRf, and this was attenuated by DOI and Ro60-0175. Conversely, the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 potentiated the effect of methylphenidate. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found for a behaviourally selective effect of 5-HT1A receptor ligands on responding for a CRf. Activation of 5-HT2A receptors selectively inhibits responding for a CRf. 5-HT2C receptor ligands exerted bidirectional modulation of responding for a CRf, especially when DA activity was increased. This indicates that 5-HT2C receptor activity is an important modulator of DA-dependent reward-related behaviours.
OBJECTIVES: These experiments examined the effects of selective 5-HT1A, 5-HT2A and 5-HT2C receptor ligands on responding for a conditioned reinforcer (CRf). Effects of these ligands were measured under basal conditions and following elevated dopamine (DA) activity produced by the DA reuptake inhibitor methylphenidate. METHODS:Water-restricted rats learned to associate a conditioned stimulus (CS) with water in operant chambers. Subsequently, two response levers were made available; responding on one lever delivered the CS (now a CRf), while responding on the second lever had no consequences. The effects of agonist and antagonists of 5-HT1A (8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT) and N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-2-pyridinylcyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY100635)), 5-HT2A (DOI and M100907) and 5-HT2C (Ro60-0175 and SB242084) receptors on responding were examined alone, as well as in the presence of methylphenidate. RESULTS: Responding for a CRf was reduced by the agonists 8-OH-DPAT, DOI and Ro60-0175. 8-OH-DPAT also reduced responding for water and seemed to impair responding in a non-specific fashion. None of the receptor antagonists affected responding. Methylphenidate dose-dependently enhanced responding for a CRf, and this was attenuated by DOI and Ro60-0175. Conversely, the 5-HT2C receptor antagonist SB242084 potentiated the effect of methylphenidate. CONCLUSIONS: No evidence was found for a behaviourally selective effect of 5-HT1A receptor ligands on responding for a CRf. Activation of 5-HT2A receptors selectively inhibits responding for a CRf. 5-HT2C receptor ligands exerted bidirectional modulation of responding for a CRf, especially when DA activity was increased. This indicates that 5-HT2C receptor activity is an important modulator of DA-dependent reward-related behaviours.
Authors: Elizabeth A Pehek; Christine Nocjar; Bryan L Roth; Tara A Byrd; Omar S Mabrouk Journal: Neuropsychopharmacology Date: 2006-02 Impact factor: 7.853
Authors: J R Martin; M Bös; F Jenck; J Moreau; V Mutel; A J Sleight; J Wichmann; J S Andrews; H H Berendsen; C L Broekkamp; G S Ruigt; C Köhler; A M Delft Journal: J Pharmacol Exp Ther Date: 1998-08 Impact factor: 4.030