Literature DB >> 7860087

Estimating the frequency of nonpaternity in Switzerland.

G Sasse1, H Müller, R Chakraborty, J Ott.   

Abstract

In linkage analysis and gene mapping in general, typing error and/or errors in specifying pedigree relationships between individuals typically lead to an upwards bias in recombination fraction estimates and to a loss of power for detecting linkage. [Ott J: Analysis of Human Genetic Linkage. Baltimore, Johns Hopkins University Press, 1991]. The presence of nonpaternity is the most common source of error of misspecification of pedigree relationships between individuals that can have a negative impact on pedigree analysis. We have developed estimates of underlying nonpaternity probabilities based on observed Mendelian inconsistencies. The methods were applied to a sample of 1,607 children and their parents. Genetic marker data were investigated to test for exclusions due to nonpaternity. Among the 1,607 children, 11 or 0.68% exclusions were found. When a constant nonpaternity rate was assumed for each child, its maximum likelihood estimate turned out to be 0.78% with asymptotic 95% confidence limits of 0.41% and 1.35%. When varying nonpaternity rates were assumed, its mean was estimated as 0.83% with asymptotic 95% confidence limits of 0.32% and 1.33%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7860087     DOI: 10.1159/000154241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Hered        ISSN: 0001-5652            Impact factor:   0.444


  13 in total

1.  Surname study of suicide in Austria: differences in regional suicide rates correspond to the genetic structure of the population.

Authors:  Martin Voracek; Gernot Sonneck
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

2.  William Allan Award Address: On the role and soul of a statistical geneticist.

Authors:  Jürg Ott
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2011-03-11       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Matrilateral biases in the investment of aunts and uncles : Replication in a population presumed to have high paternity certainty.

Authors:  Donald H McBurney; Jessica Simon; Steven J C Gaulin; Allan Geliebter
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2002-09

4.  Certificates of confidentiality: a valuable tool for protecting genetic data.

Authors:  C L Earley; L C Strong
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Three hundred years of low non-paternity in a human population.

Authors:  J M Greeff; J C Erasmus
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.821

6.  Estimating the prevalence of nonpaternity in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; Jochen Musch; Juergen Enczmann; Johannes Fischer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

7.  Women's sexual interests across the ovulatory cycle depend on primary partner developmental instability.

Authors:  Steven W Gangestad; Randy Thornhill; Christine E Garver-Apgar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 8.  Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences.

Authors:  Mark A Bellis; Karen Hughes; Sara Hughes; John R Ashton
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 3.710

9.  Low historical rates of cuckoldry in a Western European human population traced by Y-chromosome and genealogical data.

Authors:  M H D Larmuseau; J Vanoverbeke; A Van Geystelen; G Defraene; N Vanderheyden; K Matthys; T Wenseleers; R Decorte
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Founders, drift, and infidelity: the relationship between Y chromosome diversity and patrilineal surnames.

Authors:  Turi E King; Mark A Jobling
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2009-02-09       Impact factor: 16.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.