Literature DB >> 25944467

Three hundred years of low non-paternity in a human population.

J M Greeff1, J C Erasmus1.   

Abstract

When cuckoldry is frequent we can expect fathers to withhold investment in offspring that may not be theirs. Human paternal investment can be substantial and is in line with observations from tens of thousands of conceptions that suggest that cuckoldry is rare in humans. The generality of this claim seems to be in question as the rate of cuckoldry varies across populations and studies have mostly been on Western populations. Two additional factors complicate our conclusions, (1) current estimates of the rate of cuckoldry in humans may not reflect our past behaviour as adultery can be concealed by the use of contraceptives; and (2) it is difficult to obtain samples that are random with respect to their paternity certainty. Studies that combine genealogies with Y-chromosome haplotyping are able to circumvent some of these problems by probing into humans' historical behaviour. Here we use this approach to investigate 1273 conceptions over a period of 330 years in 23 families of the Afrikaner population in South Africa. We use haplotype frequency and diversity and coalescent simulations to show that the male population did not undergo a severe bottleneck and that paternity exclusion rates are high for this population. The rate of cuckoldry in this Western population was 0.9% (95% confidence interval 0.4-1.5%), and we argue that given the current data on historical populations we have to conclude that, at least for Western human populations, cuckoldry rate is probably in the range of 1%.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25944467      PMCID: PMC4611233          DOI: 10.1038/hdy.2015.36

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)        ISSN: 0018-067X            Impact factor:   3.821


  40 in total

Review 1.  In the name of the father: surnames and genetics.

Authors:  M A Jobling
Journal:  Trends Genet       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 11.639

2.  Mutations at Y-STR loci: implications for paternity testing and forensic analysis.

Authors:  M Kayser; A Sajantila
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Religion as a means to assure paternity.

Authors:  Beverly I Strassmann; Nikhil T Kurapati; Brendan F Hug; Erin E Burke; Brenda W Gillespie; Tatiana M Karafet; Michael F Hammer
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-06-04       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Strong maternal Khoisan contribution to the South African coloured population: a case of gender-biased admixture.

Authors:  Lluis Quintana-Murci; Christine Harmant; Hélène Quach; Oleg Balanovsky; Valery Zaporozhchenko; Connie Bormans; Paul D van Helden; Eileen G Hoal; Doron M Behar
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2010-03-25       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Relating two deep-rooted pedigrees from Central Germany by high-resolution Y-STR haplotyping.

Authors:  Manfred Kayser; Mark Vermeulen; Hans Knoblauch; Herbert Schuster; Michael Krawczak; Lutz Roewer
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int Genet       Date:  2007-03-13       Impact factor: 4.882

6.  Female choice and extra-pair paternity in a traditional human population.

Authors:  Brooke A Scelza
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-07-06       Impact factor: 3.703

7.  Estimating the prevalence of nonpaternity in Germany.

Authors:  Michael Wolf; Jochen Musch; Juergen Enczmann; Johannes Fischer
Journal:  Hum Nat       Date:  2012-06

8.  Estimating Y chromosome specific microsatellite mutation frequencies using deep rooting pedigrees.

Authors:  E Heyer; J Puymirat; P Dieltjes; E Bakker; P de Knijff
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 6.150

9.  Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating.

Authors:  D M Buss; D P Schmitt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 8.934

10.  Sex differences in subjective estimates of non-paternity rates in Austria.

Authors:  Martin Voracek; Maryanne Fisher; Todd K Shackelford
Journal:  Arch Sex Behav       Date:  2009-07-24
View more
  6 in total

Review 1.  The Y chromosome as the most popular marker in genetic genealogy benefits interdisciplinary research.

Authors:  Francesc Calafell; Maarten H D Larmuseau
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 4.132

2.  Protecting fertility clinics against sperm-related fraud: a call to action.

Authors:  Kristy Cho; Jacob Ruiter; Michael H Dahan
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Human Y-chromosome variation in the genome-sequencing era.

Authors:  Mark A Jobling; Chris Tyler-Smith
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 53.242

4.  High rate of extrapair paternity in a human population demonstrates diversity in human reproductive strategies.

Authors:  B A Scelza; S P Prall; N Swinford; S Gopalan; E G Atkinson; R McElreath; J Sheehama; B M Henn
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Infant survival in western lowland gorillas after voluntary dispersal by pregnant females.

Authors:  Jana Robeyst; Marie L Manguette; Thomas Breuer; Vidrige H Kandza; Martha M Robbins
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.163

6.  Patterns of African and Asian admixture in the Afrikaner population of South Africa.

Authors:  N Hollfelder; J C Erasmus; R Hammaren; M Vicente; M Jakobsson; J M Greeff; C M Schlebusch
Journal:  BMC Biol       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 7.431

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.