Literature DB >> 22688803

Estimating the prevalence of nonpaternity in Germany.

Michael Wolf1, Jochen Musch, Juergen Enczmann, Johannes Fischer.   

Abstract

The prevalence of nonpaternity in human societies is difficult to establish. To obtain a current and fairly unbiased estimate of the nonpaternity rate in Germany, we analysed a dataset consisting of 971 children and their parents in whom human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing had been carried out in the context of bone marrow transplantation. In this sample, nine exclusions (0.93%) could be identified on the basis of more than 300 HLA-haplotypes defined by four HLA genes. Given this number of exclusions, a maximum likelihood estimate of the nonpaternity rate in the population of 0.94% was obtained with asymptotic 95% confidence limits of 0.33% and 1.55%, respectively. This result is in accordance with recent surveys as well as findings from Switzerland for a comparable sample, and it suggests that earlier estimates of the nonpaternity rate which were often in excess of 10% may have been largely exaggerated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22688803     DOI: 10.1007/s12110-012-9143-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Nat        ISSN: 1045-6767


  25 in total

1.  Estimation of nonpaternity in the Mexican population of Nuevo Leon: a validation study with blood group markers.

Authors:  R M Cerda-Flores; S A Barton; L F Marty-Gonzalez; F Rivas; R Chakraborty
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 2.868

2.  Usefulness of conventional blood groups, DNA-minisatellites, and short tandem repeat polymorphisms in paternity testing: a comparison.

Authors:  L Henke; R Fimmers; E Josephi; S Cleef; M Dülmer; J Henke
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1999-07-26       Impact factor: 2.395

3.  Surnames and the Y chromosome.

Authors:  B Sykes; C Irven
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2000-03-17       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Misattributed paternity. A bias in the family studies in schizophrenia?

Authors:  Marco Procopio
Journal:  Med Hypotheses       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.538

5.  Non-paternity and prenatal genetic screening.

Authors:  D J Brock; A E Shrimpton
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-11-02       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Case-control study of parental age, parity and socioeconomic level in relation to childhood cancers.

Authors:  J D Dockerty; G Draper; T Vincent; S D Rowan; K J Bunch
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 7.196

7.  From vigilance to violence: mate retention tactics in married couples.

Authors:  D M Buss; T K Shackelford
Journal:  J Pers Soc Psychol       Date:  1997-02

8.  Screening for cystic fibrosis.

Authors:  A D Stewart
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1989-10-26       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.

Authors:  G M Lathrop; A B Hooper; J W Huntsman; R H Ward
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  A novel mutation of the beta-globin gene promoter (-102 C>A) and pitfalls in family screening.

Authors:  Patricia Aguilar-Martinez; Eric Jourdan; Sophie Brun; Séverine Cunat; Muriel Giansily-Blaizot; Serge Pissard; Jean-François Schved
Journal:  Am J Hematol       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 10.047

View more
  11 in total

1.  PRIMUS: rapid reconstruction of pedigrees from genome-wide estimates of identity by descent.

Authors:  Jeffrey Staples; Dandi Qiao; Michael H Cho; Edwin K Silverman; Deborah A Nickerson; Jennifer E Below
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 11.025

2.  PADRE: Pedigree-Aware Distant-Relationship Estimation.

Authors:  Jeffrey Staples; David J Witherspoon; Lynn B Jorde; Deborah A Nickerson; Jennifer E Below; Chad D Huff
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 11.025

3.  Three hundred years of low non-paternity in a human population.

Authors:  J M Greeff; J C Erasmus
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 3.821

4.  Low historical rates of cuckoldry in a Western European human population traced by Y-chromosome and genealogical data.

Authors:  M H D Larmuseau; J Vanoverbeke; A Van Geystelen; G Defraene; N Vanderheyden; K Matthys; T Wenseleers; R Decorte
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Relationships of maternal and paternal anthropometry with neonatal body size, proportions and adiposity in an Australian cohort.

Authors:  Emma Pomeroy; Jonathan C K Wells; Tim J Cole; Michael O'Callaghan; Jay T Stock
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2014-12-13       Impact factor: 2.868

6.  Familial Resemblance in Dietary Intakes of Children, Adolescents, and Parents: Does Dietary Quality Play a Role?

Authors:  Leonie H Bogl; Karri Silventoinen; Antje Hebestreit; Timm Intemann; Garrath Williams; Nathalie Michels; Dénes Molnár; Angie S Page; Valeria Pala; Stalo Papoutsou; Iris Pigeot; Lucia A Reisch; Paola Russo; Toomas Veidebaum; Luis A Moreno; Lauren Lissner; Jaakko Kaprio
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2017-08-17       Impact factor: 5.717

7.  Do mothers also "manipulate" grandparental care?

Authors:  Mari V Busch; Sandra Olaisen; Ina Jeanette Bruksås; Ivar Folstad
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 2.984

8.  High rate of extrapair paternity in a human population demonstrates diversity in human reproductive strategies.

Authors:  B A Scelza; S P Prall; N Swinford; S Gopalan; E G Atkinson; R McElreath; J Sheehama; B M Henn
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2020-02-19       Impact factor: 14.136

9.  Does facial resemblance enhance cooperation?

Authors:  Trang Giang; Raoul Bell; Axel Buchner
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-10-19       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Pedigree and genotyping quality analyses of over 10,000 DNA samples from the Generation Scotland: Scottish Family Health Study.

Authors:  Shona M Kerr; Archie Campbell; Lee Murphy; Caroline Hayward; Cathy Jackson; Louise V Wain; Martin D Tobin; Anna Dominiczak; Andrew Morris; Blair H Smith; David J Porteous
Journal:  BMC Med Genet       Date:  2013-03-22       Impact factor: 2.103

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.