Literature DB >> 16100312

Measuring paternal discrepancy and its public health consequences.

Mark A Bellis1, Karen Hughes, Sara Hughes, John R Ashton.   

Abstract

Paternal discrepancy (PD) occurs when a child is identified as being biologically fathered by someone other than the man who believes he is the father. This paper examines published evidence on levels of PD and its public health consequences. Rates vary between studies from 0.8% to 30% (median 3.7%, n = 17). Using information from genetic and behavioural studies, the article identifies those who conceive younger, live in deprivation, are in long term relationships (rather than marriages), or in certain cultural groups are at higher risk. Public health consequences of PD being exposed include family break up and violence. However, leaving PD undiagnosed means cases having incorrect information on their genetics and fathers continuing to suspect that children may not be theirs. Increasing paternity testing and use of DNA techniques in clinical and judicial procedures means more cases of PD will be identified. Given developing roles for individual's genetics in decisions made by health services, private services (for example, insurance), and even in personal lifestyle decisions, the dearth of intelligence on how and when PD should be exposed urgently needs addressing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16100312      PMCID: PMC1733152          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2005.036517

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  58 in total

1.  [DNA genotyposcoy in determining paternity: use of hybridized probes].

Authors:  Iu K Moliaka; I V Ovchinnikov; A B Shlenskiĭ; G I Korovaĭtseva; E I Rogaev
Journal:  Genetika       Date:  1997-06

2.  [Incidence of extra-conjugal paternity in a sample of the Mexican population].

Authors:  R Peñaloza; C Núñez; S Alatorre; R Lagunes; B García Escobar; F Salamanca; C Zavala
Journal:  Rev Invest Clin       Date:  1986 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 1.451

3.  On the estimation of the nonpaternity rate using more than one blood-group system.

Authors:  E Peritz; P F Rust
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1972-01       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Mismatches in genetic markers in a large family study.

Authors:  G C Ashton
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Evaluating pedigree data. I. The estimation of pedigree error in the presence of marker mistyping.

Authors:  G M Lathrop; A B Hooper; J W Huntsman; R H Ward
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  The genetic structure of a tribal population, the Yanomama Indians. XII. Biodemographic studies.

Authors:  J V Neel; K M Weiss
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  1975-01       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Laboratory evidence of unsuspected parental consanguinity among cases of disputed paternity.

Authors:  T D Houtz; R E Wenk; M A Brooks; R B Dawson
Journal:  Forensic Sci Int       Date:  1982 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  Exclusions and attributions of paternity: practical experiences of forensic genetics and statistics.

Authors:  J Valentin
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.025

9.  Expected and observed proportion of subjects excluded from paternity by blood phenotypes of a child and its mother in a sample of 171 families.

Authors:  D Salmon; J Seger; C Salmon
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 11.025

10.  Empirical validation of the Essen-Möller probability of paternity.

Authors:  M R Mickey; D W Gjertson; P I Terasaki
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 11.025

View more
  48 in total

1.  The evolution of sex-specific grandparental harm.

Authors:  William R Rice; Sergey Gavrilets; Urban Friberg
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Parental age and childhood cancer risk: A Danish population-based registry study.

Authors:  Zuelma A Contreras; Johnni Hansen; Beate Ritz; Jorn Olsen; Fei Yu; Julia E Heck
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Surname study of suicide in Austria: differences in regional suicide rates correspond to the genetic structure of the population.

Authors:  Martin Voracek; Gernot Sonneck
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 1.704

4.  Interethnic mating and risk for preterm birth among Arab-American mothers: evidence from the Arab-American Birth Outcomes Study.

Authors:  Abdulrahman M El-Sayed; Sandro Galea
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2011-06

5.  PRIMUS: rapid reconstruction of pedigrees from genome-wide estimates of identity by descent.

Authors:  Jeffrey Staples; Dandi Qiao; Michael H Cho; Edwin K Silverman; Deborah A Nickerson; Jennifer E Below
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-10-30       Impact factor: 11.025

6.  Adolescent grandchildren's perceptions of grandparents' involvement in UK: an interpretation from life course and evolutionary theory perspective.

Authors:  Mirkka Danielsbacka; Antti O Tanskanen
Journal:  Eur J Ageing       Date:  2012-07-17

7.  To name or not to name? An overview of the social and ethical issues raised by removing anonymity from sperm donors.

Authors:  Jennifer A Burr
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2010-07-12       Impact factor: 3.285

8.  Is there a Role for Genetic Counselors in Prenatal Paternity Testing? - an Assessment Based on Audit of 13 years of Clinical Experience in South Australia.

Authors:  Kate E Riley; Hayley Salvemini; Eric Haan; Lara Fitzgerald; Kirsty Stallard; Sarah Borrie; Electra Pontikinas; Anne Baxendale
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Genetics specialists' perspectives on disclosure of genomic incidental findings in the clinical setting.

Authors:  Nancy R Downing; Janet K Williams; Sandra Daack-Hirsch; Martha Driessnack; Christian M Simon
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-10-12

10.  Comparative assessment of methods for estimating individual genome-wide homozygosity-by-descent from human genomic data.

Authors:  Ozren Polasek; Caroline Hayward; Celine Bellenguez; Veronique Vitart; Ivana Kolcić; Ruth McQuillan; Vanja Saftić; Ulf Gyllensten; James F Wilson; Igor Rudan; Alan F Wright; Harry Campbell; Anne-Louise Leutenegger
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 3.969

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.