Literature DB >> 7858011

A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities.

D T Puff1, E D Pisano, K E Muller, R E Johnston, B M Hemminger, C A Burbeck, R McLelland, S M Pizer.   

Abstract

We present a paradigm for empirical evaluation of digital image enhancement algorithms for mammography that uses psychophysical methods for implementation and analysis of a clinically relevant detection task. In the experiment, the observer is asked to detect and assign to a quadrant, or indicate the absence of, a simulated mammographic structure characteristic of cancer embedded in a background image of normal breast tissue. Responses are indicated interactively on a computer workstation. The parameter values for the enhancement applied to the composite image may be varied on each trial, and structure detection performance is estimated for each enhancement condition. Preliminary investigations have provided insight into an appropriate viewing duration, and furthermore, suggest that nonradiologists may be used under this methodology for the tasks investigated thus far, for predicting parameter values for clinical investigation. We are presently using this method in evaluating several contrast enhancement algorithms of possible benefit in mammography. These methods enable an objective, clinically relevant evaluation, for the purpose of optimal parameter determination or performance assessment, of digital image-processing methods potentially used in mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7858011     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  3 in total

1.  Basic principles of ROC analysis.

Authors:  C E Metz
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 4.446

2.  Increasing scientific power with statistical power.

Authors:  K E Muller; V A Benignus
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

3.  Power Calculations for General Linear Multivariate Models Including Repeated Measures Applications.

Authors:  Keith E Muller; Lisa M Lavange; Sharon Landesman Ramey; Craig T Ramey
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  1992-12-01       Impact factor: 5.033

  3 in total
  7 in total

1.  Soft copy display requirements for digital mammography.

Authors:  Bradley M Hemminger
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Contrast limited adaptive histogram equalization image processing to improve the detection of simulated spiculations in dense mammograms.

Authors:  E D Pisano; S Zong; B M Hemminger; M DeLuca; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 4.056

3.  The effect of intensity windowing on the detection of simulated masses embedded in dense portions of digitized mammograms in a laboratory setting.

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Chandramouli; B M Hemminger; D Glueck; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; D Puff; W Garrett; S Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Does intensity windowing improve the detection of simulated calcifications in dense mammograms?

Authors:  E D Pisano; J Chandramouli; B M Hemminger; M DeLuca; D Glueck; R E Johnston; K Muller; M P Braeuning; S Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 4.056

5.  Contrast, noise, and blur affect performance and appreciation of digital radiographs.

Authors:  I M van Overveld
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 4.056

6.  Fractional anisotropy distributions in 2- to 6-year-old children with autism.

Authors:  C Cascio; M Gribbin; S Gouttard; R G Smith; M Jomier; S Field; M Graves; H C Hazlett; K Muller; G Gerig; J Piven
Journal:  J Intellect Disabil Res       Date:  2012-09-24

7.  Approximating the Geisser-Greenhouse sphericity estimator and its applications to diffusion tensor imaging.

Authors:  Meagan E Clement-Spychala; David Couper; Hongtu Zhu; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Interface       Date:  2010-01-01       Impact factor: 0.582

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.