Literature DB >> 8573626

Contrast, noise, and blur affect performance and appreciation of digital radiographs.

I M van Overveld1.   

Abstract

We have studied the effect of the simultaneous variation of contrast, noise, and blur on the perceived quality of digital radiograph images. Three images were processed with different levels of roentgen photon noise, different luminance (gray-level) ranges, and different amounts of Gaussian blur. Observers had to rate the quality of the images on a numerical scale. To study how the quality judgment is related to the visibility of small details (diagnostic quality), an artificial detail was added to each image. The detail could be in two possible locations. The visibility of this detail was measured in a two-alternative forced-choice experiment. One of the conclusions is that the quality judgment was based mainly on blur, whereas the visibility of details was affected mostly by noise.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8573626     DOI: 10.1007/bf03168716

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Digit Imaging        ISSN: 0897-1889            Impact factor:   4.056


  9 in total

1.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 13. Effect of simple structured noise on the detectability of simulated stenotic lesions.

Authors:  K Ohara; K Doi; C E Metz; M L Giger
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.071

Review 2.  Human visual perception and ROC methodology in medical imaging.

Authors:  M S Chesters
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  The sensitivity performance of the human eye on an absolute scale.

Authors:  A ROSE
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1948-02

4.  Investigation of basic imaging properties in digital radiography. 8. Detection of simulated low-contrast objects in digital subtraction angiographic images.

Authors:  K Ohara; H P Chan; K Doi; M L Giger; H Fujita
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  1986 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Digital chest radiography: effect on diagnostic accuracy of hard copy, conventional video, and reversed gray scale video display formats.

Authors:  H MacMahon; C E Metz; K Doi; T Kim; M L Giger; H P Chan
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-09       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  A method for determination of optimal image enhancement for the detection of mammographic abnormalities.

Authors:  D T Puff; E D Pisano; K E Muller; R E Johnston; B M Hemminger; C A Burbeck; R McLelland; S M Pizer
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 4.056

7.  The information spectrum as a measure of radiographic image quality and system performance.

Authors:  H Kanamori; M Matsumoto
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Loci of contextual effects in judgment.

Authors:  B A Mellers; M H Birnbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1982-08       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Visual perception and image display terminals.

Authors:  H L Kundel
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.303

  9 in total
  1 in total

1.  Detection and Grading of Hypertensive Retinopathy Using Vessels Tortuosity and Arteriovenous Ratio.

Authors:  Sufian A Badawi; Muhammad Moazam Fraz; Muhammad Shehzad; Imran Mahmood; Sajid Javed; Emad Mosalam; Ajay Kamath Nileshwar
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2022-01-10       Impact factor: 4.056

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.