Literature DB >> 24790282

Power Calculations for General Linear Multivariate Models Including Repeated Measures Applications.

Keith E Muller1, Lisa M Lavange2, Sharon Landesman Ramey3, Craig T Ramey3.   

Abstract

Recently developed methods for power analysis expand the options available for study design. We demonstrate how easily the methods can be applied by (1) reviewing their formulation and (2) describing their application in the preparation of a particular grant proposal. The focus is a complex but ubiquitous setting: repeated measures in a longitudinal study. Describing the development of the research proposal allows demonstrating the steps needed to conduct an effective power analysis. Discussion of the example also highlights issues that typically must be considered in designing a study. First, we discuss the motivation for using detailed power calculations, focusing on multivariate methods in particular. Second, we survey available methods for the general linear multivariate model (GLMM) with Gaussian errors and recommend those based on F approximations. The treatment includes coverage of the multivariate and univariate approaches to repeated measures, MANOVA, ANOVA, multivariate regression, and univariate regression. Third, we describe the design of the power analysis for the example, a longitudinal study of a child's intellectual performance as a function of mother's estimated verbal intelligence. Fourth, we present the results of the power calculations. Fifth, we evaluate the tradeoffs in using reduced designs and tests to simplify power calculations. Finally, we discuss the benefits and costs of power analysis in the practice of statistics. We make three recommendations: Align the design and hypothesis of the power analysis with the planned data analysis, as best as practical.Embed any power analysis in a defensible sensitivity analysis.Have the extent of the power analysis reflect the ethical, scientific, and monetary costs. We conclude that power analysis catalyzes the interaction of statisticians and subject matter specialists. Using the recent advances for power analysis in linear models can further invigorate the interaction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analysis of variance; Multivariate linear models; Noncentral distribution; Repeated measures; Sample size determination

Year:  1992        PMID: 24790282      PMCID: PMC4002049          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.1992.10476281

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  11 in total

1.  Increasing scientific power with statistical power.

Authors:  K E Muller; V A Benignus
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1992 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

2.  Unbalanced repeated-measures models with structured covariance matrices.

Authors:  R I Jennrich; M D Schluchter
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-12       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  MANOVA method for analyzing repeated measures designs: an extensive primer.

Authors:  R G O'Brien; M K Kaiser
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 17.737

4.  Recommendations for appropriate statistical practice in toxicologic experiments.

Authors:  K E Muller; C N Barton; V A Benignus
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 4.294

5.  Enhancing the outcomes of low-birth-weight, premature infants. A multisite, randomized trial. The Infant Health and Development Program.

Authors: 
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-06-13       Impact factor: 56.272

6.  Compensatory tracking in humans with elevated carboxyhemoglobin.

Authors:  V A Benignus; K E Muller; M V Smith; K S Pieper; J D Prah
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.763

7.  Infant Health and Development Program for low birth weight, premature infants: program elements, family participation, and child intelligence.

Authors:  C T Ramey; D M Bryant; B H Wasik; J J Sparling; K H Fendt; L M LaVange
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 8.  The contribution of low birth weight to infant mortality and childhood morbidity.

Authors:  M C McCormick
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-01-10       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  Absence of symptoms with carboxyhemoglobin levels of 16-23%.

Authors:  V A Benignus; E R Kafer; K E Muller; M W Case
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1987 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.763

10.  The effects of low-level carbon monoxide exposure upon evoked cortical potentials in young and elderly men.

Authors:  T J Harbin; V A Benignus; K E Muller; C N Barton
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1988 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.763

View more
  47 in total

1.  Adjusting power for a baseline covariate in linear models.

Authors:  Deborah H Glueck; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2003-08-30       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 2.  Sample size estimation in research with dependent measures and dichotomous outcomes.

Authors:  Kevin L Delucchi
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Avoiding bias in mixed model inference for fixed effects.

Authors:  Matthew J Gurka; Lloyd J Edwards; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.373

4.  BIAS IN LINEAR MODEL POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE CALCULATION DUE TO ESTIMATING NONCENTRALITY.

Authors:  Douglas J Taylor; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 0.893

5.  BIAS IN LINEAR MODEL POWER AND SAMPLE SIZE DUE TO ESTIMATING VARIANCE.

Authors:  Keith E Muller; Virginia B Pasour
Journal:  Commun Stat Theory Methods       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 0.893

6.  A New F Approximation for the Pillai-Bartlett Trace under H0.

Authors:  Keith E Muller
Journal:  J Comput Graph Stat       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 2.302

7.  Power calculation for overall hypothesis testing with high-dimensional commensurate outcomes.

Authors:  Yueh-Yun Chi; Matthew J Gribbin; Jacqueline L Johnson; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 2.373

8.  Computing Confidence Bounds for Power and Sample Size of the General Linear Univariate Model.

Authors:  Douglas J Taylor; Keith E Muller
Journal:  Am Stat       Date:  1995-01-01       Impact factor: 8.710

9.  Lumbar sympathetic blockade in children with complex regional pain syndromes: a double blind placebo-controlled crossover trial.

Authors:  Petra M Meier; David Zurakowski; Charles B Berde; Navil F Sethna
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 7.892

10.  The catechol-O-methyltransferase Val(108/158)Met polymorphism affects antidepressant response to paroxetine in a naturalistic setting.

Authors:  Francesco Benedetti; Cristina Colombo; Adele Pirovano; Elena Marino; Enrico Smeraldi
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-11-07       Impact factor: 4.530

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.