Literature DB >> 7853371

Counselling following diagnosis of a fetal abnormality: the differing approaches of obstetricians, clinical geneticists, and genetic nurses.

T Marteau1, H Drake, M Bobrow.   

Abstract

Women receiving a positive diagnosis of an abnormality during pregnancy may be counselled about a termination by one of several types of health professionals including obstetricians, geneticists, and genetic nurses. There is anecdotal evidence to suggest that these groups differ in both their approaches to counselling and their attitudes towards abnormality. The aim of the current study is to document how genetic nurses, geneticists, and obstetricians describe their own counselling of women following the diagnosis of specific fetal abnormalities. Obstetricians reported counselling in a significantly more directive fashion than did geneticists, who in turn reported counselling in a more directive way than did genetic nurses. The extent to which the groups differed in their reported approaches varied across conditions. The most marked difference was evident for Down's syndrome: 94% of genetic nurses, 57% of geneticists, and 32% of obstetricians reported counselling non-directively. Future research needs to focus on what these different groups see as the objectives of counselling in this situation, how they actually counsel, and with what effects.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction; Professional Patient Relationship

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7853371      PMCID: PMC1016660          DOI: 10.1136/jmg.31.11.864

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Genet        ISSN: 0022-2593            Impact factor:   6.318


  5 in total

1.  Decisions following the intrauterine diagnosis of sex chromosome aneuploidy.

Authors:  A Robinson; B G Bender; M G Linden
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1989-12

Review 2.  Prenatal genetic testing and screening: constructing needs and reinforcing inequities.

Authors:  A Lippman
Journal:  Am J Law Med       Date:  1991

3.  Parental decisions regarding termination of pregnancy following prenatal detection of sex chromosome abnormality.

Authors:  M Holmes-Siedle; M Ryynanen; R H Lindenbaum
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  1987-05       Impact factor: 3.050

4.  Medical geneticists confront ethical dilemmas: cross-cultural comparisons among 18 nations.

Authors:  D C Wertz; J C Fletcher; J J Mulvihill
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 11.025

5.  Decision making during serious illness: what role do patients really want to play?

Authors:  L F Degner; J A Sloan
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 6.437

  5 in total
  11 in total

1.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.

Authors:  D S King
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.903

2.  Pregnancy continuation and organizational religious activity following prenatal diagnosis of a lethal fetal defect are associated with improved psychological outcome.

Authors:  Simon Gregory; Allison Ashley-Koch; Heidi Cope; Melanie E Garrett
Journal:  Prenat Diagn       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 3.050

3.  Experiences of prenatal diagnosis of spina bifida or hydrocephalus in parents who decide to continue with their pregnancy.

Authors:  Julie Chaplin; Robert Schweitzer; Shelley Perkoulidis
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Communication about risk--dilemmas for general practitioners. The Department of General Practice Working Group, University of Wales College of Medicine.

Authors:  A Edwards; L Prior
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Continuing with pregnancy after a diagnosis of lethal abnormality: experience of five couples and recommendations for management.

Authors:  L S Chitty; C A Barnes; C Berry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1996-08-24

6.  A Method for Analyzing Videotaped Genetic Counseling Sessions.

Authors:  A Liede; L Kerzin-Storrar; D Craufurd
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.537

7.  Differences in individual approaches: communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lobb; Phyllis Butow; Alexandra Barratt; Bettina Meiser; Katherine Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Attitudes of health care trainees about genetics and disability: issues of access, health care communication, and decision making.

Authors:  Kelly E Ormond; Carol J Gill; Patrick Semik; Kristi L Kirschner
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.537

9.  Paediatrics-based fetal care: unanswered ethical questions.

Authors:  Stephen D Brown; Anne D Lyerly; Margaret O Little; John D Lantos
Journal:  Acta Paediatr       Date:  2008-10-13       Impact factor: 2.299

10.  Negotiating acceptable termination of pregnancy for non-lethal fetal anomaly: a qualitative study of professional perspectives.

Authors:  Lisa Crowe; Ruth H Graham; Stephen C Robson; Judith Rankin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.