Literature DB >> 26141185

A Method for Analyzing Videotaped Genetic Counseling Sessions.

A Liede1, L Kerzin-Storrar, D Craufurd.   

Abstract

This study describes the development and evaluation of a multi-item scale for analyzing the genetic counseling process, the Manchester Observation Code (MOC) for genetic counseling. The instrument is specific to the field of genetic counseling and is designed for analysis of the communication between counselor and client. Coding is done directly from videotaped sessions. Because communication is the means by which genetic counseling is accomplished, the method measures four relevant components of communication: (1) grammatical form, (2) purpose, (3) subject, and (4) cue source. The instrument enables an observer to code the counselor's statements into these four components. Three videotaped sessions were used to measure interrater reliability, or the consistency of rating for each of the four communication domains using this method. Three videotaped sessions were also used to measure test-retest reliability, or the consistency of the designed method from one time to another. A total of 21 videotaped sessions were tested using the method. A statistical measure of reliability established consistency of the designed method; Cohen's kappa yielded 0.7 for interrater reliability and 0.79 for test-retest reliability. These findings suggest this instrument may be used to identify important elements of the genetic counseling process.

Year:  2000        PMID: 26141185     DOI: 10.1023/A:1009459908884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet Couns        ISSN: 1059-7700            Impact factor:   2.537


  38 in total

1.  Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Revealed identity: a study of the process of genetic counselling.

Authors:  D Armstrong; S Michie; T Marteau
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 4.634

3.  Model identifying the reproductive decision after genetic counseling.

Authors:  P G Frets; H J Duivenvoorden; F Verhage; E Ketzer; M F Niermeijer
Journal:  Am J Med Genet       Date:  1990-04

4.  Patients' subjective interpretation of risks offered in genetic counselling.

Authors:  J H Pearn
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1973-06       Impact factor: 6.318

5.  The value of feedback in teaching interviewing skills to medical students.

Authors:  P Maguire; P Roe; D Goldberg; S Jones; C Hyde; T O'Dowd
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1978-11       Impact factor: 7.723

6.  Communication patterns of primary care physicians.

Authors:  D L Roter; M Stewart; S M Putnam; M Lipkin; W Stiles; T S Inui
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1997 Jan 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  The ability of trainee general practitioners to identify psychological distress among their patients.

Authors:  D P Goldberg; L Jenkins; T Millar; E B Faragher
Journal:  Psychol Med       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 7.723

8.  Counselling following diagnosis of fetal abnormality: a comparison between German, Portuguese and UK geneticists.

Authors:  T Marteau; H Drake; M Reid; M Feijoo; M Soares; I Nippert; P Nippert; M Bobrow
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.246

9.  Counselling following diagnosis of a fetal abnormality: the differing approaches of obstetricians, clinical geneticists, and genetic nurses.

Authors:  T Marteau; H Drake; M Bobrow
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 6.318

10.  Neurofibromatosis type 1 (NF1): knowledge, experience, and reproductive decisions of affected patients and families.

Authors:  C M Benjamin; A Colley; D Donnai; H Kingston; R Harris; L Kerzin-Storrar
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 6.318

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the content and process of genetic counseling: a critical review of empirical studies.

Authors:  Bettina Meiser; Jennifer Irle; Elizabeth Lobb; Kristine Barlow-Stewart
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2008-09-13       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Differences in individual approaches: communication in the familial breast cancer consultation and the effect on patient outcomes.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Lobb; Phyllis Butow; Alexandra Barratt; Bettina Meiser; Katherine Tucker
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 2.537

3.  Communication analysis of BRCA1 genetic counseling.

Authors:  Lee Ellington; Debra Roter; William N Dudley; Bonnie J Baty; Renn Upchurch; Susan Larson; Jean E Wylie; Ken R Smith; Jeffrey R Botkin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.537

4.  Analyzing the process and content of genetic counseling in familial breast cancer consultations.

Authors:  Phyllis N Butow; Elizabeth A Lobb
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.537

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.