Literature DB >> 10226925

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and the 'new' eugenics.

D S King.   

Abstract

Preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PID) is often seen as an improvement upon prenatal testing. I argue that PID may exacerbate the eugenic features of prenatal testing and make possible an expanded form of free-market eugenics. The current practice of prenatal testing is eugenic in that its aim is to reduce the numbers of people with genetic disorders. Due to social pressures and eugenic attitudes held by clinical geneticists in most countries, it results in eugenic outcomes even though no state coercion is involved. I argue that technological advances may soon make PID widely accessible. Because abortion is not involved, and multiple embryos are available, PID is radically more effective as a tool of genetic selection. It will also make possible selection on the basis of non-pathological characteristics, leading, potentially, to a full-blown free-market eugenics. For these reasons, I argue that PID should be strictly regulated.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Analytical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10226925      PMCID: PMC479204          DOI: 10.1136/jme.25.2.176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Ethics        ISSN: 0306-6800            Impact factor:   2.903


  14 in total

1.  Preimplantation diagnosis: points to consider.

Authors:  Sonia Le Bris
Journal:  Biomed Ethics       Date:  1998

2.  Is non-directive genetic counselling possible?

Authors:  A Clarke
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1991-10-19       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  Ethical and legal issues in preimplantation genetic screening.

Authors:  J A Robertson
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 7.329

4.  Commentary: Preimplantation diagnosis raises a philosophical dilemma.

Authors:  J A Raeburn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-26

5.  Cloning, dignity and ethical revisionism.

Authors:  A Kahn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1997-07-24       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Development of a self-administered questionnaire to measure women's knowledge of prenatal screening and diagnostic tests.

Authors:  T M Marteau; M Johnston; M Plenicar; R W Shaw; J Slack
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 3.006

7.  Attributions for disability: the influence of genetic screening.

Authors:  T M Marteau; H Drake
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 4.634

8.  Antenatal maternal serum screening for Down's syndrome: results of a demonstration project.

Authors:  N J Wald; A Kennard; J W Densem; H S Cuckle; T Chard; L Butler
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1992-08-15

9.  Pregnancies from biopsied human preimplantation embryos sexed by Y-specific DNA amplification.

Authors:  A H Handyside; E H Kontogianni; K Hardy; R M Winston
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1990-04-19       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Obstetricians' views on prenatal diagnosis and termination of pregnancy: 1980 compared with 1993.

Authors:  J M Green
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1995-03
View more
  12 in total

1.  Consumerism in prenatal diagnosis: a challenge for ethical guidelines.

Authors:  W Henn
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 2.  Molecular diagnostics in preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Authors:  Alan R Thornhill; Karen Snow
Journal:  J Mol Diagn       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.568

Review 3.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis in clinical practice.

Authors:  E Kanavakis; J Traeger-Synodinos
Journal:  J Med Genet       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 6.318

4.  Should doctors intentionally do less than the best?

Authors:  J Savulescu
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 2.903

5.  Just diagnosis? Preimplantation genetic diagnosis and injustices to disabled people.

Authors:  T S Petersen
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.903

6.  Preimplantation genetic diagnosis: does age of onset matter (anymore)?

Authors:  Timothy Krahn
Journal:  Med Health Care Philos       Date:  2008-11-01

7.  Everything in moderation, even hype: learning from vaccine controversies to strike a balance with CRISPR.

Authors:  Shawna Benston
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.903

8.  Public Perceptions of Ethical, Legal and Social Implications of Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.

Authors:  Angelina P Olesen; Siti Nurani Mohd Nor; Latifah Amin; Anisah Che Ngah
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2016-12-19       Impact factor: 3.525

9.  Religious Scholars' Attitudes and Views on Ethical Issues Pertaining to Pre-Implantation Genetic Diagnosis (PGD) in Malaysia.

Authors:  A Olesen; S N Nor; L Amin
Journal:  J Bioeth Inq       Date:  2016-06-30       Impact factor: 1.352

10.  "Eugenics talk" and the language of bioethics.

Authors:  S Wilkinson
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.903

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.