Literature DB >> 7851330

Sampling strategies in nested case-control studies.

B Langholz1, D Clayton.   

Abstract

A stratified version of nested case-control sampling which we call "countermatching" is presented. This design uses data available for all cohort members to obtain a sample for collecting additional information in a case-control substudy. Hitherto the only stratified sampling design for such studies has involved matching of controls to cases with respect to confounding variables. However, in some situations, rather than sampling to make controls as similar as possible to cases, we might wish to make them as different as possible. This is achieved by the counter-matched design. Statistical analysis of counter-matched studies is straightforward using existing computer software. We investigate the use of the design when a surrogate measure of exposure is available for the full cohort, but accurate exposure data is to be collected only in a nested case-control study, and when exposure data are available for the whole cohort but data concerning important confounders are not. Asymptotic relative efficiency calculations indicate that a substantial efficiency gain relative to simple random sampling of controls can be expected in these situations. We also illustrate how the design might be implemented in practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7851330      PMCID: PMC1566552          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.94102s847

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  6 in total

1.  DDT and related compounds and risk of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  D H Garabrant; J Held; B Langholz; J M Peters; T M Mack
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1992-05-20       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Vigorous exercise in leisure-time and the incidence of coronary heart-disease.

Authors:  J N Morris; S P Chave; C Adam; C Sirey; L Epstein; D J Sheehan
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1973-02-17       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Synthetic retrospective studies and related topics.

Authors:  N Mantel
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1973-09       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Reduction of breast cancer mortality through mass screening with modern mammography. First results of the Nijmegen project, 1975-1981.

Authors:  A L Verbeek; J H Hendriks; R Holland; M Mravunac; F Sturmans; N E Day
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1984-06-02       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Radon exposure, cigarette smoking, and other mining experience in the beaverlodge uranium miners cohort.

Authors:  K A L'Abbé; G R Howe; J D Burch; A B Miller; J Abbatt; P Band; W Choi; J Du; J Feather; R Gallagher
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.316

6.  Lung cancer mortality (1950-80) in relation to radon daughter exposure in a cohort of workers at the Eldorado Beaverlodge uranium mine.

Authors:  G R Howe; R C Nair; H B Newcombe; A B Miller; J D Abbatt
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  1986-08       Impact factor: 13.506

  6 in total
  18 in total

Review 1.  Adjustments for unmeasured confounders in pharmacoepidemiologic database studies using external information.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Robert J Glynn; Kenneth J Rothman; Jerry Avorn; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Risk of subsequent endometrial carcinoma associated with endometrial intraepithelial neoplasia classification of endometrial biopsies.

Authors:  James V Lacey; George L Mutter; Marisa R Nucci; Brigitte M Ronnett; Olga B Ioffe; Brenda B Rush; Andrew G Glass; Douglas A Richesson; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Bryan Langholz; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2008-10-15       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Matched designs and causal diagrams.

Authors:  Mohammad A Mansournia; Miguel A Hernán; Sander Greenland
Journal:  Int J Epidemiol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 7.196

4.  Fitting general relative risk models for survival time and matched case-control analysis.

Authors:  Bryan Langholz; David B Richardson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-12-31       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Nested exposure case-control sampling: a sampling scheme to analyze rare time-dependent exposures.

Authors:  Jan Feifel; Madlen Gebauer; Martin Schumacher; Jan Beyersmann
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2018-11-13       Impact factor: 1.588

6.  Design and analysis of nested case-control studies for recurrent events subject to a terminal event.

Authors:  Ina Jazić; Sebastien Haneuse; Benjamin French; Gaëtan MacGrogan; Virginie Rondeau
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2019-07-09       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Theory and methodology: essential tools that can become dangerous belief systems.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Nicholas Patrick Jewell; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 8.082

Review 8.  Better cancer biomarker discovery through better study design.

Authors:  Andrew Rundle; Habibul Ahsan; Paolo Vineis
Journal:  Eur J Clin Invest       Date:  2012-09-23       Impact factor: 4.686

9.  Absolute risk of endometrial carcinoma during 20-year follow-up among women with endometrial hyperplasia.

Authors:  James V Lacey; Mark E Sherman; Brenda B Rush; Brigitte M Ronnett; Olga B Ioffe; Máire A Duggan; Andrew G Glass; Douglas A Richesson; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Bryan Langholz
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-01-11       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  PTEN expression in endometrial biopsies as a marker of progression to endometrial carcinoma.

Authors:  James V Lacey; George L Mutter; Brigitte M Ronnett; Olga B Ioffe; Máire A Duggan; Brenda B Rush; Andrew G Glass; Douglas A Richesson; Nilanjan Chatterjee; Bryan Langholz; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2008-07-15       Impact factor: 12.701

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.