Literature DB >> 23918854

Matched designs and causal diagrams.

Mohammad A Mansournia1, Miguel A Hernán, Sander Greenland.   

Abstract

We use causal diagrams to illustrate the consequences of matching and the appropriate handling of matched variables in cohort and case-control studies. The matching process generally forces certain variables to be independent despite their being connected in the causal diagram, a phenomenon known as unfaithfulness. We show how causal diagrams can be used to visualize many previous results about matched studies. Cohort matching can prevent confounding by the matched variables, but censoring or other missing data and further adjustment may necessitate control of matching variables. Case-control matching generally does not prevent confounding by the matched variables, and control of matching variables may be necessary even if those were not confounders initially. Matching on variables that are affected by the exposure and the outcome, or intermediates between the exposure and the outcome, will ordinarily produce irremediable bias.

Keywords:  Matching; bias; causal diagram; unfaithfulness

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918854      PMCID: PMC3733703          DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyt083

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0300-5771            Impact factor:   7.196


  14 in total

1.  Quantifying biases in causal models: classical confounding vs collider-stratification bias.

Authors:  Sander Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  A structural approach to selection bias.

Authors:  Miguel A Hernán; Sonia Hernández-Díaz; James M Robins
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  Matching and efficiency in cohort studies.

Authors:  S Greenland; H Morgenstern
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Absence of confounding does not correspond to collapsibility of the rate ratio or rate difference.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.822

5.  Possibility of selection bias in matched case-control studies using friend controls.

Authors:  W D Flanders; H Austin
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1986-07       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 6.  Design and analysis of case-control studies.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 21.981

7.  On the need for the rare disease assumption in case-control studies.

Authors:  S Greenland; D C Thomas
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 4.897

8.  High-dimensional propensity score adjustment in studies of treatment effects using health care claims data.

Authors:  Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jeremy A Rassen; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Helen Mogun; M Alan Brookhart
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

9.  Overadjustment bias and unnecessary adjustment in epidemiologic studies.

Authors:  Enrique F Schisterman; Stephen R Cole; Robert W Platt
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 4.822

10.  Sampling strategies in nested case-control studies.

Authors:  B Langholz; D Clayton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  41 in total

1.  Ovarian Cancer in Women of African Ancestry (OCWAA) consortium: a resource of harmonized data from eight epidemiologic studies of African American and white women.

Authors:  Joellen M Schildkraut; Lauren C Peres; Traci N Bethea; Fabian Camacho; Deanna Chyn; Emily K Cloyd; Elisa V Bandera; Alicia Beeghly-Fadiel; Loren Lipworth; Charlotte E Joslin; Faith G Davis; Patricia G Moorman; Evan Myers; Heather M Ochs-Balcom; Veronica Wendy Setiawan; Malcolm C Pike; Anna H Wu; Lynn Rosenberg
Journal:  Cancer Causes Control       Date:  2019-06-24       Impact factor: 2.506

2.  Risk Factors for Cardiovascular Disease Among Thyroid Cancer Survivors: Findings From the Utah Cancer Survivors Study.

Authors:  Jihye Park; Brenna E Blackburn; Patricia A Ganz; Kerry Rowe; John Snyder; Yuan Wan; Vikrant Deshmukh; Michael Newman; Alison Fraser; Ken Smith; Kim Herget; Anne C Kirchhoff; Dev Abraham; Jaewhan Kim; Marcus Monroe; Mia Hashibe
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2018-07-01       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  A cautionary note about estimating effects of secondary exposures in cohort studies.

Authors:  K A Ahrens; S R Cole; D Westreich; R W Platt; E F Schisterman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-01-14       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  Limitations of individual causal models, causal graphs, and ignorability assumptions, as illustrated by random confounding and design unfaithfulness.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-02-17       Impact factor: 8.082

5.  The current deconstruction of paradoxes: one sign of the ongoing methodological "revolution".

Authors:  Miquel Porta; Paolo Vineis; Francisco Bolúmar
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-07-12       Impact factor: 8.082

6.  Biases in Randomized Trials: A Conversation Between Trialists and Epidemiologists.

Authors:  Mohammad Ali Mansournia; Julian P T Higgins; Jonathan A C Sterne; Miguel A Hernán
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 4.822

7.  Bias in matched case-control studies: DAGs are not enough.

Authors:  Neil Pearce
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-01-25       Impact factor: 8.082

8.  Theory and methodology: essential tools that can become dangerous belief systems.

Authors:  Sander Greenland; Nicholas Patrick Jewell; Mohammad Ali Mansournia
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2018-05       Impact factor: 8.082

9.  How subgroup analyses can miss the trees for the forest plots: A simulation study.

Authors:  Michael Webster-Clark; John A Baron; Michele Jonsson Funk; Daniel Westreich
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 6.437

10.  Regression approaches in the test-negative study design for assessment of influenza vaccine effectiveness.

Authors:  H S Bond; S G Sullivan; B J Cowling
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 2.451

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.