Literature DB >> 20065186

Absolute risk of endometrial carcinoma during 20-year follow-up among women with endometrial hyperplasia.

James V Lacey1, Mark E Sherman, Brenda B Rush, Brigitte M Ronnett, Olga B Ioffe, Máire A Duggan, Andrew G Glass, Douglas A Richesson, Nilanjan Chatterjee, Bryan Langholz.   

Abstract

PURPOSE The severity of endometrial hyperplasia (EH)-simple (SH), complex (CH), or atypical (AH)-influences clinical management, but valid estimates of absolute risk of clinical progression to carcinoma are lacking. Materials and METHODS We conducted a case-control study nested in a cohort of 7,947 women diagnosed with EH (1970-2002) at one prepaid health plan who remained at risk for at least 1 year. Patient cases (N = 138) were diagnosed with carcinoma, on average, 6 years later (range, 1 to 24 years). Patient controls (N = 241) were matched to patient cases on age at EH, date of EH, and duration of follow-up, and they were counter-matched to patient cases on EH severity. After we independently reviewed original slides and medical records of patient controls and patient cases, we combined progression relative risks (AH v SH, CH, or disordered proliferative endometrium [ie, equivocal EH]) from the case-control analysis with clinical censoring information (ie, hysterectomy, death, or left the health plan) on all cohort members to estimate interval-specific (ie, 1 to 4, 5 to 9, and 10 to 19 years) and cumulative (ie, through 4, 9, and 19 years) progression risks. Results For nonatypical EH, cumulative progression risk increased from 1.2% (95% CI, 0.6% to 1.9%) through 4 years to 1.9% (95% CI, 1.2% to 2.6%) through 9 years to 4.6% (95% CI, 3.3% to 5.8%) through 19 years after EH diagnosis. For AH, cumulative risk increased from 8.2% (95% CI, 1.3% to 14.6%) through 4 years to 12.4% (95% CI, 3.0% to 20.8%) through 9 years to 27.5% (95% CI, 8.6% to 42.5%) through 19 years after AH. CONCLUSION Cumulative 20-year progression risk among women who remain at risk for at least 1 year is less than 5% for nonatypical EH but is 28% for AH.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20065186      PMCID: PMC2834395          DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.1315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  22 in total

Review 1.  Limitations of the odds ratio in gauging the performance of a diagnostic, prognostic, or screening marker.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes; Gary Longton; Wendy Leisenring; Polly Newcomb
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2004-05-01       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia: a prospective study. Endometrial Hyperplasia Study Group.

Authors:  N Terakawa; J Kigawa; Y Taketani; H Yoshikawa; A Yajima; K Noda; H Okada; J Kato; M Yakushiji; O Tanizawa; S Fujimoto; S Nozawa; T Takahashi; K Hasumi; N Furuhashi; T Aono; A Sakamoto; M Furusato
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol Res       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  Estimation of absolute risk from nested case-control data.

Authors:  B Langholz; O Borgan
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  The biologic significance of cytologic atypia in progestogen-treated endometrial hyperplasia.

Authors:  A Ferenczy; M Gelfand
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1989-01       Impact factor: 8.661

Review 5.  Endometrial hyperplasia/adenocarcinoma. a conventional approach.

Authors:  Michael T Mazur
Journal:  Ann Diagn Pathol       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 2.090

6.  Risk of progression in complex and atypical endometrial hyperplasia: clinicopathologic analysis in cases with and without progestogen treatment.

Authors:  L-C Horn; U Schnurrbusch; K Bilek; B Hentschel; J Einenkel
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2004 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.437

7.  The behavior of endometrial hyperplasia. A long-term study of "untreated" hyperplasia in 170 patients.

Authors:  R J Kurman; P F Kaminski; H J Norris
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1985-07-15       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Spontaneous endometrial hyperplasia. A prospective, 5 year follow-up of 246 patients after abrasio only, including 380 patients followed-up for 2 years.

Authors:  B Lindahl; R Willén
Journal:  Anticancer Res       Date:  1994 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.480

9.  Atypical endometrial hyperplasia: grounds for possible misdiagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Pedro Valenzuela; J Miguel Sanz; Jerry Keller
Journal:  Gynecol Obstet Invest       Date:  2003-10-07       Impact factor: 2.031

10.  Sampling strategies in nested case-control studies.

Authors:  B Langholz; D Clayton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  41 in total

1.  Pathologic findings following false-positive screening tests for ovarian cancer in the Prostate, Lung, Colorectal and Ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening trial.

Authors:  Sarah J Nyante; Amanda Black; Aimée R Kreimer; Máire A Duggan; J Daniel Carreon; Bruce Kessel; Saundra S Buys; Lawrence R Ragard; Karen A Johnson; Barbara K Dunn; Lois Lamerato; John M Commins; Christine D Berg; Mark E Sherman
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  Biomarkers of progestin therapy resistance and endometrial hyperplasia progression.

Authors:  Kristen Upson; Kimberly H Allison; Susan D Reed; Carolyn D Jordan; Katherine M Newton; Elizabeth M Swisher; Jennifer A Doherty; Rochelle L Garcia
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Clinically significant endometrial cancer risk following a diagnosis of complex atypical hyperplasia.

Authors:  Anthony B Costales; Kathleen M Schmeler; Russell Broaddus; Pamela T Soliman; Shannon N Westin; Pedro T Ramirez; Michael Frumovitz
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 5.482

Review 4.  The diagnosis and treatment of endometrial cancer: progress and controversies.

Authors:  Dominik Denschlag; Uwe Ulrich; Günter Emons
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2010-08-29       Impact factor: 5.594

Review 5.  Management of endometrial precancers.

Authors:  Cornelia L Trimble; Michael Method; Mario Leitao; Karen Lu; Olga Ioffe; Moss Hampton; Robert Higgins; Richard Zaino; George L Mutter
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 7.661

6.  Histopathology of women with non-uniform endometrial echogenicity and risk factors for atypical endometrial hyperplasia and carcinoma.

Authors:  Qing Cong; Lingxiao Luo; Zhongpeng Fu; Jiaqi Lu; Wei Jiang; Long Sui
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2021-05-15       Impact factor: 4.060

7.  Quantitative assessment of the association between CYP1A1 A4889G polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk.

Authors:  Min Li; Yuan-Yue Li; Xiao-Yan Xin; Ying Han; Ting-Ting Wu; Hong-Bo Wang
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-07-17

Review 8.  Current Issues in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Endometrial Carcinoma.

Authors:  J Stubert; B Gerber
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.915

9.  Association between cytochrome P450 1A1 MspI polymorphism and endometrial cancer risk: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Linxiao Han; Yanyan Liu; Weiwei Cao; Xiuying Yuan; Cuifeng Li
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2013-08-07

10.  Sox9 overexpression in uterine epithelia induces endometrial gland hyperplasia.

Authors:  Gabriel Gonzalez; Shyamin Mehra; Ying Wang; Haruhiko Akiyama; Richard R Behringer
Journal:  Differentiation       Date:  2016-06-01       Impact factor: 3.880

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.