Literature DB >> 20044379

Fitting general relative risk models for survival time and matched case-control analysis.

Bryan Langholz1, David B Richardson.   

Abstract

Cox proportional hazards regression analysis of survival data and conditional logistic regression analysis of matched case-control data are methods that are widely used by epidemiologists. Standard statistical software packages accommodate only log-linear model forms, which imply exponential exposure-response functions and multiplicative interactions. In this paper, the authors describe methods for fitting non-log-linear Cox and conditional logistic regression models. The authors use data from a study of lung cancer mortality among Colorado Plateau uranium miners (1950-1982) to illustrate these methods for fitting general relative risk models to matched case-control control data, countermatched data with weights, d:m matching, and full cohort Cox regression using the SAS statistical package (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 20044379      PMCID: PMC3291085          DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwp403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  11 in total

1.  Exposure stratified case-cohort designs.

Authors:  O Borgan; B Langholz; S O Samuelsen; L Goldstein; J Pogoda
Journal:  Lifetime Data Anal       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 1.588

2.  An incidence density sampling program for nested case-control analyses.

Authors:  D B Richardson
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 4.402

3.  Estimation of the relative excess risk due to interaction and associated confidence bounds.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Jay S Kaufman
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2009-02-11       Impact factor: 4.897

4.  A simple approach for fitting linear relative rate models in SAS.

Authors:  David B Richardson
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2008-10-25       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  More on "Biased selection of controls for case-control analyses of cohort studies".

Authors:  J M Robins; M H Gail; J H Lubin
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.571

6.  Covariance analysis of censored survival data.

Authors:  N Breslow
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis.

Authors:  S Greenland
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  Quantitative risk assessment of lung cancer in U.S. uranium miners.

Authors:  R W Hornung; T J Meinhardt
Journal:  Health Phys       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 1.316

Review 9.  Models for the analysis of radon-exposed populations.

Authors:  J H Lubin
Journal:  Yale J Biol Med       Date:  1988 May-Jun

10.  Sampling strategies in nested case-control studies.

Authors:  B Langholz; D Clayton
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1994-11       Impact factor: 9.031

View more
  16 in total

1.  Hierarchical latency models for dose-time-response associations.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Richard F MacLehose; Bryan Langholz; Stephen R Cole
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Background stratified Poisson regression analysis of cohort data.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Bryan Langholz
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Exposure-response assessment of cancer mortality in styrene-exposed boatbuilders.

Authors:  Robert Douglas Daniels; Stephen J Bertke
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2020-05-29       Impact factor: 4.402

4.  Examining temporal effects on cancer risk in the international nuclear workers' study.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Stephen J Bertke; David B Richardson; Elisabeth Cardis; Michael Gillies; Jacqueline A O'Hagan; Richard Haylock; Dominique Laurier; Klervi Leuraud; Monika Moissonnier; Isabelle Thierry-Chef; Ausrele Kesminiene; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

5.  Mortality and ionising radiation exposures among workers employed at the Fernald Feed Materials Production Center (1951-1985).

Authors:  Sharon R Silver; Stephen J Bertke; Misty Jena Hein; Robert D Daniels; Donald A Fleming; Jeri L Anderson; Susan M Pinney; Richard W Hornung; Chih-Yu Tseng
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2013-01-15       Impact factor: 4.402

6.  Mortality in a combined cohort of uranium enrichment workers.

Authors:  James H Yiin; Jeri L Anderson; Robert D Daniels; Stephen J Bertke; Donald A Fleming; David J Tollerud; Chih-Yu Tseng; Pi-Hsueh Chen; Kathleen M Waters
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 2.214

7.  Risk of leukaemia mortality from exposure to ionising radiation in US nuclear workers: a pooled case-control study.

Authors:  Robert D Daniels; Stephen Bertke; Kathleen M Waters; Mary K Schubauer-Berigan
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2012-09-21       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  Radiation-related risk of basal cell carcinoma: a report from the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study.

Authors:  Tanya C Watt; Peter D Inskip; Kayla Stratton; Susan A Smith; Stephen F Kry; Alice J Sigurdson; Marilyn Stovall; Wendy Leisenring; Leslie L Robison; Ann C Mertens
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2012-07-25       Impact factor: 13.506

9.  Post-MGUS Diagnosis Serum Monoclonal-Protein Velocity and the Progression of Monoclonal Gammopathy of Undetermined Significance to Multiple Myeloma.

Authors:  Su-Hsin Chang; Jason Gumbel; Suhong Luo; Theodore S Thomas; Kristen M Sanfilippo; Jingqin Luo; Graham A Colditz; Kenneth R Carson
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-09-09       Impact factor: 4.254

10.  General Relative Rate Models for the Analysis of Studies Using Case-Cohort Designs.

Authors:  David B Richardson; Bryan Langholz; Kaitlin Kelly-Reif
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 4.897

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.