Literature DB >> 7848073

Biomechanical assessment of quiet standing and changes associated with aging.

V P Panzer1, S Bandinelli, M Hallett.   

Abstract

The kinematics of standing balance were analyzed in 24 normal subjects, aged 21 to 78 years, to examine differences attributable to age, visual input, and sex. Movements of individual body segments, displacement of the center of gravity (COG), and position of the center of pressure (COP) were measured, and total path length and variability about the mean position were derived from the resulting values. Aging was associated with an increase in variability of the COG, head, and hip, but not in path length. The changes, which may be clinically interpreted as excess postural sway, do not show stability deficits as a consequence of aging. On the contrary, older subjects seem to adopt a postural control strategy that achieves comparable stability during quiet standing. Eye closure increased the anterior-posterior COP path length without corresponding changes in the COG, indicating an increase in small accelerations without associated instability. There was more medial-lateral movement in women than in men. Quantitative electromyographic measures showed that, in general, quiet standing requires very little muscular activity. We conclude that the task of quiet standing produces no evidence of postural instability concurrent with aging. The altered postural control strategy may be less effective when balance is suddenly or severely compromised.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7848073     DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(95)80024-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  31 in total

1.  Mobility assessment: sensitivity and specificity of measurement sets in older adults.

Authors:  Victoria P Panzer; Dorothy B Wakefield; Charles B Hall; Leslie I Wolfson
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Effect of forefoot type on postural stability - a cross sectional comparative study.

Authors:  Guru Karthikeyan; Shamjibhai Jadav Jayraj; Venkatesan Narayanan
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2015-04

3.  Patterns of gait variability across the lifespan in persons with and without down syndrome.

Authors:  Beth A Smith; Nicholas Stergiou; Beverly D Ulrich
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.649

4.  Steadiness in plantar flexor muscles and its relation to postural sway in young and elderly adults.

Authors:  Motoki Kouzaki; Minoru Shinohara
Journal:  Muscle Nerve       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.217

5.  A comparison of accelerometry and center of pressure measures during computerized dynamic posturography: a measure of balance.

Authors:  S L Whitney; J L Roche; G F Marchetti; C-C Lin; D P Steed; G R Furman; M C Musolino; M S Redfern
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2011-02-17       Impact factor: 2.840

6.  Balance abilities of different-aged workers in physically demanding jobs.

Authors:  Anne Punakallio
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

Review 7.  Potential Mechanisms of Acute Standing Balance Deficits After Concussions and Subconcussive Head Impacts: A Review.

Authors:  Calvin Z Qiao; Anthony Chen; Jean-Sébastien Blouin; Lyndia C Wu
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Concurrent Validity of Inertially Sensed Measures during Voluntary Body Sway in Silence and while Exposed to a Rhythmic Acoustic Stimulus: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Analina Emmanouil; Elissavet Rousanoglou; Anastasia Georgaki; Konstantinos Boudolos
Journal:  Digit Biomark       Date:  2021-03-23

9.  Age-associated increase in postural variability relate to greater low-frequency center of pressure oscillations.

Authors:  Stefan Delmas; Tatsunori Watanabe; Basma Yacoubi; Evangelos A Christou
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2020-12-26       Impact factor: 2.840

10.  Postural instability does not necessarily correlate to poor performance: case in point.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Stephen M Kavic; Ivan M George; Adrian E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-02-08       Impact factor: 3.453

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.