Literature DB >> 25883870

Effect of forefoot type on postural stability - a cross sectional comparative study.

Guru Karthikeyan1, Shamjibhai Jadav Jayraj1, Venkatesan Narayanan1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Weight-bearing foot structure may influence postural control by either decreasing the base of support (BOS) or increasing the passive instability of the joints of the foot. Poor postural control has been implicated as the main causative factor for foot and ankle injuries. The purpose of this study was to examine the influence of forefoot postures on postural stability during single limb stance.
METHODOLOGY: Sixty healthy individuals between the ages of 18 to 31 were selected using a purposive sampling procedure based on forefoot angle measurements and categorized into three groups; high forefoot varus (≥8°) (n=20), neutral forefoot varus (1°-8°) (n=20) and low forefoot varus group (≤1°) (n=20). Static foot measurements, including relaxed rearfoot angle and navicular drop, and foot dimentsions were performed. Height and weight were also recorded for all the subjects. Center of Pressure (COP) excursion in Anterior-posterior (AP) and Medial-lateral (ML) planes and Stability Index (SI) with eyes open and eyes closed conditions were also measured using the force platform.
RESULTS: Strong correlations were found between forefoot angle and rearfoot angle (r=0.71, p<0.01), forefoot angle and navicular drop (r=0.58, p<0.01), and between rearfoot angle and navicular drop (r=0.661, p<0.01). There were no correlations (p>0.05) between the forefoot angle and all the five COP measures, except between forefoot angle and SI with eyes closed (r= -0.25 p<0.01).
CONCLUSION: There is a significant positive correlation between forefoot angle and rearfoot angle and between forefoot angle and navicular drop. Forefoot angles did not affect the maximum AP COP and ML COP excursions or SI in healthy subjects. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Center of pressure; forefoot varus; navicular drop; postural control; rearfoot angle; stability index

Year:  2015        PMID: 25883870      PMCID: PMC4387729     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 2159-2896


  35 in total

1.  Effect of rearfoot orthotics on postural sway after lateral ankle sprain.

Authors:  J Hertel; C R Denegar; W E Buckley; N A Sharkey; W L Stokes
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.966

2.  Significance of proprioceptive mechanisms in the regulation of stance.

Authors:  V Dietz; G A Horstmann; W Berger
Journal:  Prog Brain Res       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.453

3.  The relationship between forefoot, midfoot, and rearfoot static alignment in pain-free individuals.

Authors:  Kirsten Rossner Buchanan; Irene Davis
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.751

Review 4.  Interaction of vestibular, somatosensory and visual signals for postural control and motion perception under terrestrial and microgravity conditions--a conceptual model.

Authors:  T Mergner; T Rosemeier
Journal:  Brain Res Brain Res Rev       Date:  1998-11

5.  Assessing the influence of sensory interaction of balance. Suggestion from the field.

Authors:  A Shumway-Cook; F B Horak
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1986-10

6.  Intrasubject variability of selected force-platform parameters in the quantification of postural control.

Authors:  A C Geurts; B Nienhuis; T W Mulder
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 3.966

7.  Stabilometry recordings in functional and mechanical instability of the ankle joint.

Authors:  H Tropp; P Odenrick; J Gillquist
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Effects of Pronated and Supinated Foot Postures on Static and Dynamic Postural Stability.

Authors:  Karen P Cote; Michael E Brunet; Bruce M Gansneder; Sandra J Shultz
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.860

9.  Differences in Postural Control During Single-Leg Stance Among Healthy Individuals With Different Foot Types.

Authors:  Jay Hertel; Michael R Gay; Craig R Denegar
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.860

View more
  2 in total

1.  Does the lower extremity alignment affect the risk of falling?

Authors:  Gülnur Taşçı Bozbaş; Gülcan Gürer
Journal:  Turk J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-10-03

2.  Relationship between patient-reported outcome measures (PROM) and three measures of foot-ankle alignment in patients with metatarsal head pain: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Manuel González-Sánchez; Esther Velasco-Ramos; Maria Ruiz Muñoz; Antonio I Cuesta-Vargas
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2016-12-16       Impact factor: 2.303

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.