Literature DB >> 17287912

Postural instability does not necessarily correlate to poor performance: case in point.

Gyusung Lee1, Stephen M Kavic, Ivan M George, Adrian E Park.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: It is very important for surgeons who perform minimally invasive surgery (MIS) to maintain proper postural stability, which kinematic research can determine. Previous studies in surgical ergonomics have shown that postural stability is correlated to instrument type, task difficulty, and skill level. What should also be considered is that surgeons may strategically change stance or joint movement to achieve better surgical outcomes while potentially subjecting themselves to greater risk. Background information about subjects, e.g., joint impairment, should be considered an important surgical ergonomic element. Such information can lead to more realistic and accurate conclusions about postural stability and joint kinematics.
METHODS: A highly experienced and skilled right-handed surgeon developing carpal tunnel syndrome in both wrists was recruited into a small (6 subjects) performance study of pegboard transfer and circle-cutting tasks from the Fundamentals of Laparoscopic Surgery (FLS) skill set. Joint kinematics and postural data were collected using two associated force plates and a motion capture system of 12 digital, high-resolution, high-speed, infrared cameras.
RESULTS: Each task was completed in less than 90 s. In pegboard transfer, the subject increased shoulder abduction angle to align his hand and forearm and minimize wrist flexion. When circle-cutting required excessive wrist flexion, the subject maintained his lower body position and stance while twisting his torso, a strategy that appeared to stabilize tangential direction related to cutting while maintaining a fixed orientation of forearm, wrist, and hand. In another circle-cutting trial, the subject changed his stance primarily by shifting foot position as necessary to obtain better scissor approach angles. These compensatory, strategic movements caused an increase in overall postural sway but did not represent postural instability.
CONCLUSION: This case study indicated that poor joint kinematics or postural stability does not necessarily correlate to poor performance. Instead, they may indicate positive compensatory or strategic movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17287912     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-006-9144-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   3.453


  14 in total

1.  NACOB presentation CSB New Investigator Award. Balance recovery from medio-lateral perturbations of the upper body during standing. North American Congress on Biomechanics.

Authors:  S Rietdyk; A E Patla; D A Winter; M G Ishac; C E Little
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Comparison of orthodox versus off-optical axis endoscopic manipulations.

Authors:  T A Emam; G Hanna; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Changes in postural mechanics associated with different types of minimally invasive surgical training exercises.

Authors:  J C Gillette; N E Quick; G L Adrales; R Shapiro; A E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-10-29       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Center of pressure measures during standing tasks in minimally impaired persons with multiple sclerosis.

Authors:  Gregory M Karst; Dawn M Venema; Tammy G Roehrs; Amy E Tyler
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.649

5.  Importance of body sway velocity information in controlling ankle extensor activities during quiet stance.

Authors:  Kei Masani; Milos R Popovic; Kimitaka Nakazawa; Motoki Kouzaki; Daichi Nozaki
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-08-27       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Center of gravity, center of pressure, and supportive forces during human activities.

Authors:  M P Murray; A Seireg; R C Scholz
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1967-12       Impact factor: 3.531

7.  Relations between standing stability and body posture parameters in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  Marie-Lyne Nault; Paul Allard; Sébastien Hinse; Richard Le Blanc; Olivier Caron; Hubert Labelle; Heydar Sadeghi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-09-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Biomechanical assessment of quiet standing and changes associated with aging.

Authors:  V P Panzer; S Bandinelli; M Hallett
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 9.  Ergonomics, engineering and surgery of endosurgical dissection.

Authors:  M Patkin; L Isabel
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1995-04

Review 10.  Minimal access surgery (MAS)-related surgeon morbidity syndromes.

Authors:  D A G Reyes; B Tang; A Cuschieri
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 3.453

View more
  9 in total

1.  Development of a more robust tool for postural stability analysis of laparoscopic surgeons.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Adrian E Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries.

Authors:  Gyusung I Lee; Mija R Lee; Tameka Clanton; Tamera Clanton; Erica Sutton; Adrian E Park; Michael R Marohn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Higher physical workload risks with NOTES versus laparoscopy: a quantitative ergonomic assessment.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Erica Sutton; Tameka Clanton; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-11-03       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Ergonomic risk associated with assisting in minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Gyusung Lee; Tommy Lee; David Dexter; Carlos Godinez; Nora Meenaghan; Robert Catania; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Experience implication in subjective surgical ergonomics comparison between laparoscopic and robot-assisted surgeries.

Authors:  V Mendes; Franck Bruyere; Jean Michel Escoffre; Aurelien Binet; Hubert Lardy; Henri Marret; Frederic Marchal; Thomas Hebert
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2019-03-12

6.  An interactive method for achieving ergonomically optimum conditions during laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Chang-Lin Hu; Ching-Yao Yang; Zhan-Sheng Lin; Shan-Yi Yang; Chien-Hung Kuo; Ming-Tsan Lin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2012-04-24

7.  Surgeon activity in robotic versus abdominal gynecologic surgery.

Authors:  Sarah A Collins; David M O'Sullivan; Paul K Tulikangas
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2011-10-20

8.  Ergon-trial: ergonomic evaluation of single-port access versus three-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Luca Bertolaccini; Andrea Viti; Alberto Terzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  The ergonomics of women in surgery.

Authors:  Erica Sutton; Myra Irvin; Craig Zeigler; Gyusung Lee; Adrian Park
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 4.584

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.