Literature DB >> 33977219

Concurrent Validity of Inertially Sensed Measures during Voluntary Body Sway in Silence and while Exposed to a Rhythmic Acoustic Stimulus: A Pilot Study.

Analina Emmanouil1, Elissavet Rousanoglou1, Anastasia Georgaki2, Konstantinos Boudolos1.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The effect of rhythmic acoustic stimuli on body sway is of increasing interest due to their positive contribution when training or restoring the control of movement. Inertial sensors show promise as a portable, easier, and more affordable method compared to the force plate "gold standard" concerning the evaluation of postural sway. This study examined the concurrent validity of inertially sensed measures of voluntary body sway against those obtained with a force plate, in silence and while exposed to a rhythmic acoustic stimulus.
METHODS: Temporal (sway duration and variability) and spatial (trajectory length, variability, range, velocity, and area) body sway variables were extracted using an inertial sensor (at L5) in synchronization with a force plate, during anteroposterior body sway in silence and while exposed to a rhythmic acoustic stimulus (n = 18 young women; two 70-s trials in each condition). Statistics included bivariate correlations between the inertially sensed and the force plate measures, separately, in silence and with a rhythmic acoustic stimulus, as well as for the effect of the rhythmic acoustic stimulus (percentage difference from silence) (p ≤ 0.05, SPSS v25.0).
RESULTS: The inertially sensed measures demonstrated good-to-excellent concurrent validity for all temporal and almost all spatial variables, both in silence and with rhythmic acoustic stimulus (r > 0.75, p = 0.000), as well as for the rhythmic acoustic-stimulus effect (r > 0.75, p ≤ 0.05).
CONCLUSION: The inertially sensed measures of the voluntary anteroposterior body sway demonstrated an overall good-to-excellent concurrent validity against those obtained with the force plate "gold standard," both in the silence and the rhythmic acoustic stimulus conditions, as well as for the rhythmic acoustic-stimulus effect. The findings of this pilot study allow the recommendation of inertial sensing for the evaluation of postural control alterations when exposed to rhythmic acoustic stimuli, a condition of increasing interest due to the positive contribution of such stimuli when training or restoring the control of movement.
Copyright © 2021 by S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Balance; Force plate; Music; Postural control; Wearable sensors

Year:  2021        PMID: 33977219      PMCID: PMC8077493          DOI: 10.1159/000514325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digit Biomark        ISSN: 2504-110X


  31 in total

1.  Effects of body lean and visual information on the equilibrium maintenance during stance.

Authors:  Marcos Duarte; Vladimir M Zatsiorsky
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-06-27       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Influence of musical groove on postural sway.

Authors:  Jessica M Ross; Anne S Warlaumont; Drew H Abney; Lillian M Rigoli; Ramesh Balasubramaniam
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Flexible muscle modes and synergies in challenging whole-body tasks.

Authors:  Alessander Danna-Dos-Santos; Adriana M Degani; Mark L Latash
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Responses to Achilles tendon vibration during self-paced, visually and auditory-guided periodic sway.

Authors:  Saritha M Radhakrishnan; Vassilia Hatzitaki; Dimitrios Patikas; Ioannis G Amiridis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Effects of increased anterior-posterior voluntary sway frequency on mechanical and perceived postural stability.

Authors:  Teresa Martin Lorenzo; Jos Vanrenterghem
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.161

6.  Reliability and validity of an accelerometry based measure of static and dynamic postural stability in healthy and active individuals.

Authors:  Nicholas R Heebner; Jonathan S Akins; Scott M Lephart; Timothy C Sell
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2014-12-15       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Gaze position interferes in body sway in young adults.

Authors:  Carolina Menezes Fiorelli; Paula Fávaro Polastri; Sérgio Tosi Rodrigues; André Macari Baptista; Tiago Penedo; Vinicius Alota Ignácio Pereira; Lucas Simieli; Fabio Augusto Barbieri
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 3.046

8.  Music and metronome cues produce different effects on gait spatiotemporal measures but not gait variability in healthy older adults.

Authors:  Joanne E Wittwer; Kate E Webster; Keith Hill
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2012-08-04       Impact factor: 2.840

9.  ISway: a sensitive, valid and reliable measure of postural control.

Authors:  Martina Mancini; Arash Salarian; Patricia Carlson-Kuhta; Cris Zampieri; Laurie King; Lorenzo Chiari; Fay B Horak
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 4.262

10.  Measuring postural stability with an inertial sensor: validity and sensitivity.

Authors:  Christopher Neville; Caleb Ludlow; Brian Rieger
Journal:  Med Devices (Auckl)       Date:  2015-11-05
View more
  1 in total

1.  Predicting Axial Impairment in Parkinson's Disease through a Single Inertial Sensor.

Authors:  Luigi Borzì; Ivan Mazzetta; Alessandro Zampogna; Antonio Suppa; Fernanda Irrera; Gabriella Olmo
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-06       Impact factor: 3.576

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.