Literature DB >> 7845767

The contribution of motion, the visual frame, and visual polarity to sensations of body tilt.

I P Howard1, L Childerson.   

Abstract

Three types of visual information contribute to the sense of self orientation with respect to gravity: visual polarity of objects with a distinct top and bottom, the principal vertical and horizontal lines of the visual environment, and visual motion. Three visual displays were designed to investigate the contribution of each visual feature to illusory self tilt: a large sphere lined with dots, a cubic room lined with dots, and a furnished room with floor and ceiling. In experiment 1 the dotted room and the furnished room were tilted to various angles about the roll axis of the erect subject who set a visual line and an unseen rod to the apparent vertical. In the dotted room, settings were made either with respect to the nearest surface to the horizontal or with respect to the nearest diagonal of the room. In the furnished room, settings were made with respect to the nearest horizontal wall but not with respect to diagonals. In experiment 2 each of the three displays was rotated at constant velocity and subjects' responses were classified into four categories: illusory self tilt at a constant angle, alternating self tilt with the body becoming erect each time a surface became horizontal, continuous head-over-heels self rotation, and a feeling that the body was supine. Almost all responses were of constant tilt in the sphere. Constant and alternating tilt were the most common responses in the dotted room. In the furnished room 60% of subjects experienced full head-over-heels self rotation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7845767     DOI: 10.1068/p230753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  18 in total

1.  Subjective somatosensory vertical during dynamic tilt is dependent on task, inertial condition, and multisensory concordance.

Authors:  W G Wright; S Glasauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; Michael R Jenkin; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Characterizing head motion in three planes during combined visual and base of support disturbances in healthy and visually sensitive subjects.

Authors:  E A Keshner; Y Dhaher
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 4.  Self and world: large scale installations at science museums.

Authors:  Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  2008

5.  Visuospatial orientation: Differential effects of head and body positions.

Authors:  Patricia Castro; Shahvaiz Hussain; Omer G Mohamed; Diego Kaski; Qadeer Arshad; Adolfo M Bronstein; Amir Kheradmand
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 3.046

6.  Influence of visual scene velocity on segmental kinematics during stance.

Authors:  Kalpana Dokka; Robert V Kenyon; Emily A Keshner
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2009-06-07       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  The habitual motor vertical of humans depends on gravicentric and egocentric cues, but only little on visual cues.

Authors:  Nils Bury; Otmar Bock
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2018-06-22       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  A Bayesian model of the disambiguation of gravitoinertial force by visual cues.

Authors:  Paul R MacNeilage; Martin S Banks; Daniel R Berger; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-11-30       Impact factor: 2.064

9.  The effects of local rotation on roll vection induced by globally rotating visual inducer.

Authors:  Shinji Nakamura
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-05-27

10.  Differential effects of visual feedback on subjective visual vertical accuracy and precision.

Authors:  Daniel Bjasch; Christopher J Bockisch; Dominik Straumann; Alexander A Tarnutzer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.