Literature DB >> 16550392

The subjective visual vertical and the perceptual upright.

Richard T Dyde1, Michael R Jenkin, Laurence R Harris.   

Abstract

The direction of 'up' has traditionally been measured by setting a line (luminous if necessary) to the apparent vertical, a direction known as the 'subjective visual vertical' (SVV); however for optimum performance in visual skills including reading and facial recognition, an object must to be seen the 'right way up'--a separate direction which we have called the 'perceptual upright' (PU). In order to measure the PU, we exploited the fact that some symbols rely upon their orientation for recognition. Observers indicated whether the symbol 'horizontal P' presented in various orientations was identified as either the letter 'p' or the letter 'd'. The average of the transitions between 'p-to-d' and 'd-to-p' interpretations was taken as the PU. We have labelled this new experimental technique the Oriented CHAracter Recognition Test (OCHART). The SVV was measured by estimating whether a line was rotated clockwise or counter-clockwise relative to gravity. We measured the PU and SVV while manipulating the orientation of the visual background in different observer postures: upright, right side down and (for the PU) supine. When the body, gravity and the visual background were aligned, the SVV and the PU were similar, but as the background orientation and observer posture orientations diverged, the two measures varied markedly. The SVV was closely aligned with the direction of gravity whereas the PU was closely aligned with the body axis. Both probes showed influences of all three cues (body orientation, vision and gravity) and these influences could be predicted from a weighted vectorial sum of the directions indicated by these cues. For the SVV, the ratio was 0.2:0.1:1.0 for the body, visual and gravity cues, respectively. For the PU, the ratio was 2.6:1.2:1.0. In the case of the PU, these same weighting values were also predicted by a measure of the reliability of each cue; however, reliability did not predict the weightings for the SVV. This is the first time that maximum likelihood estimation has been demonstrated in combining information between different reference frames. The OCHART technique provides a new, simple and readily applicable method for investigating the PU which complements the SVV. Our findings suggest that OCHART is particularly suitable for investigating the functioning of visual and non-visual systems and their contributions to the perceived upright of novel environments such as high- and low-g environments, and in patient and ageing populations, as well as for normal observers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16550392     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-006-0405-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  36 in total

1.  Properties of the internal representation of gravity inferred from spatial-direction and body-tilt estimates.

Authors:  A D Van Beuzekom; J A Van Gisbergen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Prior knowledge on the illumination position.

Authors:  P Mamassian; R Goutcher
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2001-08

3.  Three-dimensional eye position during static roll and pitch in humans.

Authors:  C J Bockisch; T Haslwanter
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Orientation dependence in the recognition of familiar and novel views of three-dimensional objects.

Authors:  S Edelman; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1992-12       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  The effect of retinal and phenomenal orientation on the perception of form.

Authors:  I ROCK; W HEIMER
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1957-12

6.  Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects.

Authors:  P A McMullen; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  The relative role of visual and non-visual cues in determining the perceived direction of "up": experiments in parabolic flight.

Authors:  H L Jenkin; R T Dyde; J E Zacher; D C Zikovitz; M R Jenkin; R S Allison; I P Howard; L R Harris
Journal:  Acta Astronaut       Date:  2005 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.413

8.  Studies in space orientation; perception of the upright with displaced visual fields and with body tilted.

Authors:  S E ASCH; H A WITKIN
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1948-08

9.  Naming and locating the tops of rotated pictures.

Authors:  R H Maki
Journal:  Can J Psychol       Date:  1986-12

10.  Visually-induced eye torsion and tilt adaptation.

Authors:  I P Howard; W B Templeton
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1964-10       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  45 in total

1.  Predicting the position of moving audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Crossing the hands is more confusing for females than males.

Authors:  Michelle L Cadieux; Michael Barnett-Cowan; David I Shore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  The effect of altered gravity states on the perception of orientation.

Authors:  Richard T Dyde; Michael R Jenkin; Heather L Jenkin; James E Zacher; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-03-21       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  The motor vertical in the absence of gravicentric cues.

Authors:  Otmar Bock; Nils Bury
Journal:  NPJ Microgravity       Date:  2020-03-03       Impact factor: 4.415

5.  Effects of visual motion consistent or inconsistent with gravity on postural sway.

Authors:  Priscilla Balestrucci; Elena Daprati; Francesco Lacquaniti; Vincenzo Maffei
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-03-22       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  [Pilot study: Determination of the subjective trunk vertical in upright head position].

Authors:  M Hölzl; A Lappat; R Hülse; E Biesinger; C Arens; L Voß
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 1.284

7.  Weightlessness alters up/down asymmetries in the perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Caty De Saedeleer; Manuel Vidal; Mark Lipshits; Ana Bengoetxea; Ana Maria Cebolla; Alain Berthoz; Guy Cheron; Joseph McIntyre
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-02-09       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Body orientation contributes to modelling the effects of gravity for target interception in humans.

Authors:  Barbara La Scaleia; Francesco Lacquaniti; Myrka Zago
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2019-02-06       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Post-effect of forward and backward locomotion on body orientation in space during quiet stance.

Authors:  Alessandro Marco De Nunzio; Carlo Zanetti; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Haptic awareness changes when lying down.

Authors:  Kaian Unwalla; Michelle L Cadieux; David I Shore
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.