Literature DB >> 7842421

The excess of patients with advanced breast cancer in young women screened with mammography in the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.

R E Tarone1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: An unexpected excess of patients with breast cancer with four or more positive lymph nodes was observed in mammographically screened women who were younger than the age of 50 years at enrollment into the Canadian National Breast Screening Study (NBSS). It has been suggested that this excess is consistent with prior screening trials evaluating mammography.
METHODS: A quantitative evaluation of the distribution of patients with breast cancer with four or more positive lymph nodes in the NBSS was undertaken, and the percentages of patients with breast cancer who were at an advanced state at diagnosis in the NBSS and in previous randomized screening trials were compared. The validity of mortality analyses after eliminating advanced cases detected by physical examination at the initial screening visit is examined.
RESULTS: The excess of patients with cancer with four or more positive lymph nodes in the 40-49-year mammography age group of the NBSS was statistically significant, even when expressed as a percentage of all invasive cancers diagnosed. Such an excess is inconsistent with published data on extent of disease at diagnosis from previous studies. Analysis of NBSS mortality data after eliminating advanced cases detected by physical examination at the initial visit should result in minimal, if any, bias.
CONCLUSIONS: Mortality analyses eliminating advanced cases detected by physical examination at the initial screening visit may be less susceptible to bias caused by possible nonrandom allocation of study participants and should be considered in future evaluations of the NBSS cohort after longer follow-up periods and in meta-analyses that may include the NBSS in assessments of the efficacy of mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7842421     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19950215)75:4<997::aid-cncr2820750415>3.0.co;2-m

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  16 in total

Review 1.  Preventive health care, 2001 update: screening mammography among women aged 40-49 years at average risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  J Ringash
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.

Authors:  D B Kopans
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.677

Review 3.  Design of cancer screening trials/randomized trials for evaluation of cancer screening.

Authors:  Anthony B Miller
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Mammography and the politics of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  J Wells
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-31

5.  Point: Mammography screening-sticking to the science.

Authors:  M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.677

6.  Arguments against mammography screening continue to be based on faulty science.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2014-02

Review 7.  The wisdom trial is based on faulty reasoning and has major design and execution problems.

Authors:  Daniel B Kopans
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Breast cancer screening policy-good science should trump bad politics.

Authors:  M J Yaffe
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 3.677

9.  How Did CNBSS Influence Guidelines for So Long and What Can That Teach Us?

Authors:  Shushiela Appavoo
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.109

10.  Mammography Screening - as of 2013.

Authors:  S Heywang-Koebrunner; K Bock; W Heindel; G Hecht; L Regitz-Jedermann; A Hacker; V Kaeaeb-Sanyal
Journal:  Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.915

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.