Warning: Undefined array key "mm" in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Deprecated: trim(): Passing null to parameter #1 ($string) of type string is deprecated in /www/wwwroot/www.ai-bt.com/si.php on line 10 Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.

Literature DB >> 26628879

Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.

D B Kopans¹.

Abstract

Entities: Disease

Year: 2015 PMID： 26628879 PMCID： PMC4608412 DOI： 10.3747/co.22.2880

Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Oncol ISSN： 1198-0052 Impact factor: 3.677

× No keyword cloud information.

41 in total

1. Screening mammography--a long run for a short slide?

Authors: H Gilbert Welch
Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2010-09-23 Impact factor: 91.245

2. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.

Authors:
Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2006-01 Impact factor: 4.254

3. Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.

Authors: Cristina O'Donoghue; Martin Eklund; Elissa M Ozanne; Laura J Esserman
Journal: Ann Intern Med Date: 2014-02-04 Impact factor: 25.391

4. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors: R E Hendrick; R A Smith; J H Rutledge; C R Smart
Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr Date: 1997

5. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.

Authors: R Edward Hendrick; Mark A Helvie
Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2011-02 Impact factor: 3.959

6. Experts question IARC report saying benefits of mammography in older women outweigh risks.

Authors: Susan Mayor
Journal: BMJ Date: 2015-06-09

Review 7. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies.

Authors: Mireille Broeders; Sue Moss; Lennarth Nyström; Sisse Njor; Håkan Jonsson; Ellen Paap; Nathalie Massat; Stephen Duffy; Elsebeth Lynge; Eugenio Paci
Journal: J Med Screen Date: 2012 Impact factor: 2.136

8. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort.

Authors: Barbro Numan Hellquist; Stephen W Duffy; Shahin Abdsaleh; Lena Björneld; Pál Bordás; László Tabár; Bedrich Viták; Sophia Zackrisson; Lennarth Nyström; Håkan Jonsson
Journal: Cancer Date: 2010-09-29 Impact factor: 6.860

2. A mixed methods study: Midlife African American women's knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to well-woman visit, flu vaccine, and mammogram use.

Authors: Vida Henderson; Jessica M Madrigal; Arden Handler
Journal: J Women Aging Date: 2018-11-22

Breast cancer screening panels continue to confuse the facts and inject their own biases.

1. Screening mammography--a long run for a short slide?

2. Reduction in breast cancer mortality from organized service screening with mammography: 1. Further confirmation with extended data.

3. Aggregate cost of mammography screening in the United States: comparison of current practice and advocated guidelines.

4. Benefit of screening mammography in women aged 40-49: a new meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

5. United States Preventive Services Task Force screening mammography recommendations: science ignored.

6. Experts question IARC report saying benefits of mammography in older women outweigh risks.

Review 7. The impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality in Europe: a review of observational studies.

8. Effectiveness of population-based service screening with mammography for women ages 40 to 49 years: evaluation of the Swedish Mammography Screening in Young Women (SCRY) cohort.

9. Service screening with mammography in Northern Sweden: effects on breast cancer mortality - an update.

Review 10. Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

1. The mammography debate, round two: science, smoke and mirrors.

2. A mixed methods study: Midlife African American women's knowledge, beliefs, and barriers to well-woman visit, flu vaccine, and mammogram use.

3. The mammography debate: the senior years.

4. Is clinical breast examination important for breast cancer detection?

5. Misinformation and Facts about Breast Cancer Screening.