Literature DB >> 8164029

Effect of schedule and maintenance on the antiemetic efficacy of ondansetron combined with dexamethasone in acute and delayed nausea and emesis in patients receiving moderately emetogenic chemotherapy: a phase III trial by the National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group.

L Kaizer1, D Warr, P Hoskins, J Latreille, W Lofters, J Yau, M Palmer, B Zee, M Levy, J Pater.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: This study examines whether the schedule of ondansetron significantly influences its antiemetic efficacy in the first 24 hours after chemotherapy, whether the administration of oral ondansetron after 24 hours is effective in preventing delayed emesis, and whether the efficacy of ondansetron is preserved over multiple courses of moderately emetogenic chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A multicenter double-blind study randomized 302 cancer patients to one of three treatment arms. Arm A received dexamethasone 10 mg intravenously (i.v.) plus ondansetron (Zofran; Glaxo Canada Inc, Toronto, Canada) 8 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally every 12 hours postchemotherapy for nine doses. Arm B received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 16 mg i.v. prechemotherapy plus placebo orally postchemotherapy in the same schedule as arm A. Arm C received dexamethasone 10 mg i.v. plus ondansetron 8 mg prechemotherapy plus ondansetron 8 mg orally postchemotherapy for one dose followed by placebo orally every 12 hours for eight more doses. Response was assessed by the number of reported episodes of vomiting and by severity of nausea measured on a visual analog scale (VAS).
RESULTS: The two schedules of ondansetron used in the first 24 hours were no different in their antiemetic efficacy, with similar rates for complete responses (76.7% v 72.0%, P = .472), complete plus major responses (90.2% v 82.0%, P = .135), and severity of nausea (P = .348). Oral ondansetron after 24 hours was more effective than placebo in preventing delayed nausea and emesis, with superior rates of complete responses (59.6% v 42.1%, P = .012 by one-sided test), complete plus major responses (80.9% v 66.3%, P = .018 by one-sided test), and less severe nausea (9.2 mm v 18.6 mm on a 100-mm VAS, P = .002). The efficacy of ondansetron was maintained over subsequent courses of chemotherapy.
CONCLUSION: The schedule of ondansetron in the first 24 hours does not influence its efficacy. The use of oral maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed maintenance ondansetron is effective in preventing delayed nausea and emesis after moderately emetogenic chemotherapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8164029     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.1994.12.5.1050

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  28 in total

Review 1.  Stratified administration of serotonin 5-HT3 receptor antagonists (setrons) for chemotherapy-induced emesis. Economic implications.

Authors:  L A Sanchez; M Holdsworth; S B Bartel
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Effects of altering the time of administration and the time frame of quality of life assessments in clinical trials: an example using the EORTC QLQ-C30 in a large anti-emetic trial.

Authors:  J Pater; D Osoba; B Zee; W Lofters; M Gore; E Dempsey; M Palmer; C Chin
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1998-04       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Comparative studies of various antiemetic regimens.

Authors:  F Roila; M Tonato; E Ballatori; A Del Favero
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1996-07       Impact factor: 3.603

Review 4.  Evaluation of quality of life for diverse patient populations.

Authors:  K R Yabroff; B P Linas; K Schulman
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

Review 5.  Standard treatment of chemotherapy-induced emesis.

Authors:  D Warr
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Feasibility of olanzapine, multi acting receptor targeted antipsychotic agent, for the prevention of emesis caused by continuous cisplatin- or ifosfamide-based chemotherapy.

Authors:  Seiko Bun; Kan Yonemori; Toru Akagi; Emi Noguchi; Tatsunori Shimoi; Akihiko Shimomura; Mayu Yunokawa; Chikako Shimizu; Yasuhiro Fujiwara; Yoshinori Makino; Yoshikazu Hayashi; Kenji Tamura
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 3.850

7.  Chemotherapy-Induced Nausea and Vomiting: Time for More Emphasis on Nausea?

Authors:  Terry L Ng; Brian Hutton; Mark Clemons
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-06

8.  Safety and efficacy of aprepitant, ramosetron, and dexamethasone for chemotherapy-induced nausea and vomiting in patients with ovarian cancer treated with paclitaxel/carboplatin.

Authors:  Chel Hun Choi; Min Kyu Kim; Jin-Young Park; Aera Yoon; Ha-Jeong Kim; Yoo-Young Lee; Tae-Joong Kim; Jeong-Won Lee; Byoung-Gie Kim; Duk-Soo Bae
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 3.603

9.  Multicenter, randomized trial of ramosetron plus dexamethasone versus ramosetron alone in controlling cisplatin-induced emesis.

Authors:  Antonio Villalon; Valorie Chan
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2003-12-04       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  The efficacy and safety of palonosetron compared with granisetron in preventing highly emetogenic chemotherapy-induced vomiting in the Chinese cancer patients: a phase II, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, parallel, comparative clinical trial.

Authors:  Zhaocai Yu; Wenchao Liu; Ling Wang; Houjie Liang; Ying Huang; Xiaoming Si; Helong Zhang; Duhu Liu; Hongmei Zhang
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 3.603

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.