Literature DB >> 782759

A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions.

M D Brown, T I Malinin, P B Davis.   

Abstract

Serial roengenograms of 53 patients who had 76 cervical interspaces grafted with frozen, bone marrrow-free cadaver bone were compared to those obtained from 45 patients who received 63 iliac crest autografts for anterior cervical spine fusion. The roentgenograms were evaluated on the basis of achieving union, delayed union, non-union, and the presence of graft collapse and extrusion. No significant difference was noted in the union rate, with allografts (94%) or with autografts (97%). In 21 patients a higher rate of graft collapse was noted with allografts as compared to autografts in multilevel fusions. In these patients, allograft rejection or the biomechanical properties of the allograft may have contributed to a difference in the rate of graft collapse with cadaver bone. No difference in collapse rate was noted between allografts and autografts in 32 patients with single level fusions. Insertion of frozen bone allografts into intervertebral spaces of the cervical spine has not produced adverse reactions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1976        PMID: 782759

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  24 in total

1.  Fibular allograft after anterior cervical corpectomy: long term follow-up.

Authors:  Brodie E McKoy; Jeffrey K Wingate; Steven C Poletti; Donald R Johnson; Mark D Stanley; John A Glaser
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2002

2.  Autologous versus allogenic bone grafts in instrumented anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a prospective study with respect to bone union pattern.

Authors:  Petr Suchomel; Pavel Barsa; Pavel Buchvald; Adam Svobodnik; Eva Vanickova
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-20       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Interobservational variation in determining fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures.

Authors:  Kostas N Fountas; Eftychia Z Kapsalaki; Betsy E Smith; Leonidas G Nikolakakos; Charles H Richardson; Hugh F Smisson; Joe S Robinson; David C Parish
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction.

Authors:  M L Swank; G L Lowery; A L Bhat; R F McDonough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 5.  An update on bone substitutes for spinal fusion.

Authors:  Masashi Miyazaki; Hiroshi Tsumura; Jeffrey C Wang; Ahmet Alanay
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-12       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Current status of bone graft options for anterior interbody fusion of the cervical and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Anthony Minh Tien Chau; Lileane Liang Xu; Johnny Ho-Yin Wong; Ralph Jasper Mobbs
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-06-07       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Bone substitutes and expanders in Spine Surgery: A review of their fusion efficacies.

Authors:  Abhijeet Kadam; Paul W Millhouse; Christopher K Kepler; Kris E Radcliff; Michael G Fehlings; Michael E Janssen; Rick C Sasso; James J Benedict; Alexander R Vaccaro
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2016-09-22

Review 8.  History of Spinal Fusion: Where We Came from and Where We Are Going.

Authors:  Sohrab Virk; Sheeraz Qureshi; Harvinder Sandhu
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-02-25

9.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.