Literature DB >> 9209883

Anterior cervical allograft arthrodesis and instrumentation: multilevel interbody grafting or strut graft reconstruction.

M L Swank1, G L Lowery, A L Bhat, R F McDonough.   

Abstract

This retrospective study evaluated a single surgeon's series of patients treated by multilevel cervical disc excision (two or three levels), allograft tricortical iliac crest arthrodesis, and anterior instrumentation. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare fusion success and clinical outcome between multilevel Smith-Robinson interbody grafting and tricortical iliac strut graft reconstruction, both supplemented with anterior instrumentation in the cervical spine. The incidence of nonunion for cervical discectomy and fusion varies widely depending on the number of disc levels involved, type of bone graft used, and whether the anterior grafting is supplemented with instrumentation. An alternative to multilevel interbody fusion is corpectomy and strut grafting, in which the incidence of nonunion has been reported to be 27% with autograft and 41% with allograft. Sixty-four consecutive patients who underwent allograft tricortical iliac crest reconstruction and anterior cervical plating were studied. The average follow-up was 39 months. There were 38 patients in the discectomy and interbody grafting group and 26 patients in the corpectomy and strut graft reconstruction group. Pseudoarthrosis occurred in 42% of the anterior cervical interbody fusion patients and 31% of the corpectomy patients. Nonunion in two-level interbody fusions occurred in 36% of the patients as compared to 10% for patients with one-level corpectomies; while 54% of patients with three-level interbody fusions and 44% of patients with two-level corpectomies were noted to have pseudoarthrosis. Higher percentages of nonunion were noted in multilevel interbody grafting than in corpectomy with strut grafting and when more vertebral levels were involved. These radiographic and clinical findings underscore the shortcomings of multilevel anterior cervical allograft reconstruction with plating. Corpectomy may be the preferred method when multiple disc levels are fused. In addition, anterior corpectomy affords decompression of significant osteophytes in a safer and quicker manner. In retrospective studies, there is a need for long-term follow-up before accurate statements can be made about the study population.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9209883      PMCID: PMC3454584          DOI: 10.1007/bf01358747

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  22 in total

1.  Anterior cervical fusion with the Caspar instrumentation system.

Authors:  R H Tippets; R I Apfelbaum
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Nonunion following two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  R W Lindsey; K E Newhouse; J Leach; M J Murphy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.176

3.  Anterior interbody fusion for severe cervical disc degeneration.

Authors:  A F DePalma; R H Rothman; G E Lewinnek; S T Canale
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1972-05

4.  A roentgenographic evaluation of frozen allografts versus autografts in anterior cervical spine fusions.

Authors:  M D Brown; T I Malinin; P B Davis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1976-09       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Choice of surgical treatment for multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Yonenobu; T Fuji; K Ono; K Okada; T Yamamoto; N Harada
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1985-10       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Internal metal plate fixation combined with anterior interbody fusion in cases of cervical spine injury.

Authors:  A M Bremer; T Q Nguyen
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1983-06       Impact factor: 4.654

7.  Anterior cervical fusion for degenerated or protruded discs. A review of one hundred forty-six patients.

Authors:  D R Gore; S B Sepic
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1984-10       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Indication, surgical technique, and results of 100 surgically-treated fractures and fracture-dislocations of the cervical spine.

Authors:  M Aebi; J Mohler; G A Zäch; E Morscher
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Subtotal vertebrectomy and spinal fusion for cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  K Hanai; F Fujiyoshi; K Kamei
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Anterior cervical fusion and Caspar plate stabilization for cervical trauma.

Authors:  W Caspar; D D Barbier; P M Klara
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  26 in total

1.  Cervical anterior transpedicular screw fixation. Part I: Study on morphological feasibility, indications, and technical prerequisites.

Authors:  Heiko Koller; Axel Hempfing; Frank Acosta; Michael Fox; Armin Scheiter; Mark Tauber; Ulrich Holz; Herbert Resch; Wolfgang Hitzl
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases.

Authors:  Mihir R Bapat; Kshitij Chaudhary; Amit Sharma; Vinod Laheri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Local and global subaxial cervical spine biomechanics after single-level fusion or cervical arthroplasty.

Authors:  Michael A Finn; Darrel S Brodke; Michael Daubs; Alpesh Patel; Kent N Bachus
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-07-08       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Comparison of ventral corpectomy and plate-screw-instrumented fusion with dorsal laminectomy and rod-screw-instrumented fusion for treatment of at least two vertebral-level spondylotic cervical myelopathy.

Authors:  Rudolf Andreas Kristof; Thomas Kiefer; Marcus Thudium; Florian Ringel; Michael Stoffel; Attlila Kovacs; Christian-Andreas Mueller
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-08-07       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Cervical laminoplasty.

Authors:  Hossein Mehdain; Oliver M Stokes
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Successful treatment of cervical myelopathy with minimal morbidity by circumferential decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Henry E Aryan; Rene O Sanchez-Mejia; Sharona Ben-Haim; Christopher P Ames
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Outcomes of three anterior decompression and fusion techniques in the treatment of three-level cervical spondylosis.

Authors:  Qunfeng Guo; Xiaoda Bi; Bin Ni; Xuhua Lu; Jinshui Chen; Jian Yang; Yang Yu
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-03-30       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  Comparison between anterior cervical discectomy fusion and cervical corpectomy fusion using titanium cages for reconstruction: analysis of outcome and long-term follow-up.

Authors:  Juan S Uribe; Jaypal Reddy Sangala; Edward A M Duckworth; Fernando L Vale
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-02-12       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  [Multilevel segmental interbody fusion versus vertebral body replacement: comparison of two operative methods].

Authors:  D Daentzer; N Bianchi; D-K Böker; W Deinsberger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

10.  Three-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in elderly patients with wedge shaped tricortical autologous graft: A consecutive prospective series.

Authors:  Suk Ha Lee; Kwang Jun Oh; Kwang Su Yoon; Sung Tae Lee; Dilbans S Pandher
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.251

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.