Literature DB >> 7826990

Food photography. I: The perception of food portion size from photographs.

M Nelson1, M Atkinson, S Darbyshire.   

Abstract

Fifty-one male and female volunteers aged 18-90 years from a wide variety of social and occupational backgrounds completed 7284 assessments of portion size in relation to food photographs. Subjects were shown six portion sizes (two small, two medium and two large) for each of six foods, and asked to compare the amount on the plate in front of them to (a) a series of eight photographs showing weights of portions from the 5th to the 95th centile of portion size (British Adult Dietary Survey), or (b) a single photograph of the average (median) portion size. Photographs were prepared either in colour or in black and white, and in two different sizes. The order of presentation of foods; use of black and white or colour; the size of photographs; and presentation of eight or average photographs were each randomized independently. On average, the mean differences between the portion size presented and the estimate of portion size using the photographs varied from -8 to +6 g (-4 to +5%) for the series of eight photographs, and from -34 to -1 g (-23 to +9%) for the single average photograph. Large portion sizes tended to be underestimated more than medium or small portion sizes, especially when using the average photograph (from -79 to -14 g, -37 to -13%). Being female, 65 years and over, or retired, or seeing photographs in colour, were all associated with small but statistically significant overestimations of portion size. Having a body mass index > or = 30 kg/m2 was associated with an 8% underestimate of portion size. We conclude that use of a series of eight photographs is associated with relatively small errors in portion size perception, whereas use of an average photograph is consistently associated with substantial underestimation across a variety of foods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7826990     DOI: 10.1079/bjn19940069

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Nutr        ISSN: 0007-1145            Impact factor:   3.718


  40 in total

Review 1.  Guidelines for daily carbohydrate intake: do athletes achieve them?

Authors:  L M Burke; G R Cox; N K Culmmings; B Desbrow
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Influence of dietary factors on the clinical course of ulcerative colitis: a prospective cohort study.

Authors:  S L Jowett; C J Seal; M S Pearce; E Phillips; W Gregory; J R Barton; M R Welfare
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 3.  Measurement Errors in Dietary Assessment Using Self-Reported 24-Hour Recalls in Low-Income Countries and Strategies for Their Prevention.

Authors:  Rosalind S Gibson; U Ruth Charrondiere; Winnie Bell
Journal:  Adv Nutr       Date:  2017-11-15       Impact factor: 8.701

4.  A Comparison of Food Portion Size Estimation by Older Adults, Young Adults and Nutritionists.

Authors:  C M Timon; S E Cooper; M E Barker; A J Astell; T Adlam; F Hwang; E A Williams
Journal:  J Nutr Health Aging       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 4.075

5.  Computerized portion-size estimation compared to multiple 24-hour dietary recalls for measurement of fat, fruit, and vegetable intake in overweight adults.

Authors:  Deborah J Toobert; Lisa A Strycker; Sarah E Hampson; Erika Westling; Steven M Christiansen; Thomas G Hurley; James R Hébert
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2011-10

6.  Imaged based estimation of food volume using circular referents in dietary assessment.

Authors:  Wenyan Jia; Yaofeng Yue; John D Fernstrom; Ning Yao; Robert J Sclabassi; Madelyn H Fernstrom; Mingui Sun
Journal:  J Food Eng       Date:  2011-10-06       Impact factor: 5.354

7.  The Use of Digital Images in 24-Hour Recalls May Lead to Less Misestimation of Portion Size Compared with Traditional Interviewer-Administered Recalls.

Authors:  Sharon I Kirkpatrick; Nancy Potischman; Kevin W Dodd; Deirdre Douglass; Thea P Zimmerman; Lisa L Kahle; Frances E Thompson; Stephanie M George; Amy F Subar
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 4.798

8.  Development and validity of a 3-day smartphone assisted 24-hour recall to assess beverage consumption in a Chinese population: a randomized cross-over study.

Authors:  Lindsey P Smith; Jenna Hua; Edmund Seto; Shufa Du; Jiajie Zang; Shurong Zou; Barry M Popkin; Michelle A Mendez
Journal:  Asia Pac J Clin Nutr       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 1.662

9.  Assessment of the accuracy of portion size reports using computer-based food photographs aids in the development of an automated self-administered 24-hour recall.

Authors:  Amy F Subar; Jennifer Crafts; Thea Palmer Zimmerman; Michael Wilson; Beth Mittl; Noemi G Islam; Suzanne McNutt; Nancy Potischman; Richard Buday; Stephen G Hull; Tom Baranowski; Patricia M Guenther; Gordon Willis; Ramsey Tapia; Frances E Thompson
Journal:  J Am Diet Assoc       Date:  2010-01

10.  Effects of a Web-based food portion training program on food portion estimation.

Authors:  William T Riley; Jeannette Beasley; Allison Sowell; Albert Behar
Journal:  J Nutr Educ Behav       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.045

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.